USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Div I-A Men's Saber

Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 KIM Charlson V D V V V D V V V V V V 5.2 4 -1.2
2 ROHRLACK Charles (Charlie) F. V V V V D V V V V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
3 SHEPANEK Noah M. V D V V D V V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
3 KUPANOFF Dimitri N. V V D V V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
5 ZHOU Matthew R. V V V V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
6 SINGER Carson V V V D V V V V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
7 YAO Jonathan D V V V V V V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
8 PARK Justin W. V V D V D V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
9 WILLIAMS Nolan E. V V V V V D V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
10 BOOTH Zaheer V V D V D V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
11 MARSEE James V D D V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
12 ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. V V D V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
13 MICHELL Bailey D V V D V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
14 MOSZCZYNSKI Adam D V D V V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
15 YEN Darren V D D V V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
16 OSTER Keegan J. D V V D D V V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
17 OSOLINIEC Victor E. V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
18 AURAY Phileas V V V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
19 KOKOSINSKI Eryk V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
20 HU William V V V V D V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
21 CHOU Stephen C. D V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
22 IWAMOTO Eric Y. V V V V D V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
23 ESCUETA Tony V. V V V V V D V D 3.6 5 +1.4
24 ZHANG Michael M. V D V V V V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
25 HONG Marshall Q. V V V D V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
26 DEMAREST Iain D V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
27 LAU Jeremy Y. D V V V V D V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
28 KAUFMAN Bradley A. V V D V D V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
29 GRUBE Sterling T. D V D V V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
30 ZU Kevin D V V V D D V V D 4.4 3 -1.4
31 GREENBAUM Maxwell H. V D V D D V V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
32 SMITH Mitchell M. D V V D D V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
33 BUENAVENTURA Christian D V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
34 KANG Brandon M. V V D V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
35 CHEN Howard V V V V V D D 4.2 5 +0.8
36 MULVANEY Alec S. V V D V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
37 CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. V D V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
38 BENAVRAM Lev C. V D V V V D D 4.4 4 -0.4
39 LO Joshua H. D V V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
40 CORNEJO Jeffrey A. V V D D V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
40 NG Jonathan H. D V D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
42 GEFELL Andrew P. D V D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
43 GRATHWOL-SEAR Sebastian V V V D V D D 3.0 4 +1.0
44 VACCARI Braden V D V D V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
45 AUSTIN Adam D D V V V V D 1.7 4 +2.3
46 GILES Jeremy M. V V V D D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
47 LAI Adam J. V D D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
48 SMITH David C. V D V V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
49 BASALYGA Jeffrey V V V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
50 DANNULL Lukas J. V D V D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
51 STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. V V D V D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
51 TONG Qilin V D V D V V D 3.0 3 -
53 SHANAHAN Adam E. V D V D V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
54 RAINVILLE-POND Schuyler J. D V D D V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
55 RAI Avin V D V D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
56 BARNETT Adam D D V V V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
57 HAN Nicholas D V D D V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
58 DANNULL Linus N. V V D D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
59 TAKEMARU Leo D V V D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
59 REESE Aaron S. D D D V V V D 3.0 2 -1.0
59 DAMMER Mark W. V V D D D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
62 DILLREE Spencer S. D V D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
63 CHEN Brian D V D V D D V D 4.2 2 -2.2
64 DESAI Drewv D. D D D D V V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
65 WANG Qifa D V V V D D 1.7 3 +1.3
66 FLORES Peter D. D V V D V D D 2.3 3 +0.7
67 NI AMEN Zahir K. D V V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
68 MILLER Levi H. V D V D V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
68 LASORSA Matthew V D D D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
70 DODRILL Grant D D V V V D D 3.4 3 -0.4
71 TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. D V D V D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
72 KIM Benjamin H. D V D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
73 RIVERA Inigo Franco D D D V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
74 RAMAN Easwer V D V D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
75 KARNES Jameson D. D D V D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
76 LIN William D V D V D D 2.0 2 -
77 ARNIPALLI Shanvanth V D D D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
78 STRONG Jr James S. D V D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
79 DHINGRA Gian K. D D D D V V D 3.6 2 -1.6
80 STREB JR. Joseph T. D V D V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
80 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. D D V D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
80 BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. D V V D D D D 4.2 2 -2.2
83 HOLMES Aiden G. V D D V D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
84 YEN Preston D V D D V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
84 KAHN Justin M. V D D V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
86 FEENEY Sean V D V D D D D 2.0 2 -
86 HUDDY Brandon J. V D D V D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
88 WESLER Logan A. V D V D D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
89 DOARES Andrew D D V D V D D 3.5 2 -1.5
90 CHO Brandon D D V D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
91 RIGGINS Littleton K. D D D D V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
92 YATES Colum C. D V D V D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
93 COTTER Liam V V D D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
94 HENNICKE Michael G. D D V D D V 1.5 2 +0.5
95 WOLIN Zachary A. D D D V D V 2.1 2 -0.1
96 KAYDALIN Artyom D D V D D V 1.3 2 +0.7
97 TANG Brendan J. D D D D V 1.4 1 -0.4
98 CHIEN Phillip L. D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
99 CHAMBERS Amir E. V D D D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
100 VASILYEV Nikita K. D D D V D D 2.7 1 -1.7
101 HARRIS Alex K. D V D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
102 DU Gavin J. D D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
103 EPSTEIN Henry N. D D D V D D 0.8 1 +0.2
104 HUAYTA James W. V D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
105 WUN William V D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
106 D'ORAZIO Joseph V D D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
107 CHANG Eliot A. D D D V D D 2.5 1 -1.5
108 MONTGOMERY Jadon T. D D D V D D 2.5 1 -1.5
109 ZHOU Miles D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
110 OFFUTT Tyler T. D D D D D D 2.5 0 -2.5
111 YAN Jack P. D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
112 LAI Eric A. D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
113 BARTOLO Domenic V. D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
114 PARKER Timothy S. D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.