Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% |
| 2 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 7% | |
| 3 | KAROLAK Dale W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
| 3 | SZOKOLAY Robert E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 5 | SEGAL Mark N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 6 | CRAVEY Donald (Don) N. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 7 | HENZLER Thomas A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 8 | RICHARDS Dick | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 6% | |
| 9 | ALEXANDER Chuck | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 10 | MASE James B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 11 | SCOTT George R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 12 | GELNAW William (Gypsy) H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 3% |
| 13 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 14 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 15 | MOREAU John A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 16 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | SCHNEIDER Charles (Charlie) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 18 | WHEELER Mark C. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% | |
| 19 | SNYDER John W. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 20 | WILSON Victor T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 21 | TIERNEY Luke | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | KLEIN Johannes | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 23 | RESS Michael A. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | LOGAN Mark P. | 100% | 96% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | NEWSOME James L. | 100% | 99% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 26 | MILLIGAN Bruce C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% | 2% |
| 26 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 28 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 29 | ANDERSON Michael L. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 30 | SWANN William A. | 100% | 97% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | |
| 32 | WAGMAN Robert S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
| 33 | MCDARBY Michael B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 34 | KING Charles M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 35 | SCHREIBER Gyula S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 36 | SIMS Wallace F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 37 | SHIFER Aleksandr | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | ROSENTHAL Paul E. | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | MONES Robert (Bob) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
| 40 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | HUNKER Frederick | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | CHELNITSKY Yuriy | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | BADIOLI Carlo | 100% | 95% | 63% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | HARBER Mike | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 45 | REDDING Russel M. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 46 | GROSS Louis A. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | STONE Ken | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 48 | TKACH Robert W. | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | CORINALDI Greg | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 50 | HOUST Michael D. | 100% | 81% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 100% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | KLUCZYNSKI Mike k. | 100% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | FRANK William N. | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.