Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DAVIS Don | - | - | - | - | - | 14% | 85% |
| 2 | OLIVARES Frets G. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 3 | FOELLMER Oliver K. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 41% | 13% |
| 3 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 5 | GRANDBOIS Peter R. | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 34% |
| 6 | FELDMAN Adam | - | - | 2% | 14% | 46% | 38% | |
| 7 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 68% | 10% |
| 8 | KISSINGFORD John F. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
| 9 | WILLEY David S. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 9 | KOEHN Ted | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 11 | AMRINE JR Terry L. | 4% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 12 | HENSLEY Todd | 2% | 31% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 13 | SZEGO Levente (Levi) | - | - | 2% | 19% | 50% | 29% | |
| 14 | FADL Omar | - | 1% | 16% | 42% | 34% | 8% | |
| 15 | DIAZ Julio P. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 2% |
| 16 | JONES Sam J. | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | ESTELL Oscar M. | - | 2% | 24% | 44% | 26% | 4% | |
| 18 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 1% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 19 | BALESTRACCI Chris | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 35% | 5% | - |
| 20 | HAYENGA Gary M. | - | 1% | 20% | 43% | 30% | 6% | |
| 21 | GRAJALES Nestor L. | - | - | - | 3% | 31% | 47% | 18% |
| 22 | PROCOPIO Gregory M. | 4% | 31% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | BECKER William L. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 24 | WHARTON David | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 25 | GRISWOLD Doug | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | GALLUCH Peter G. | - | 2% | 21% | 60% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 27 | WU Clarence C. | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 1% | 18% | 43% | 31% | 7% | - | - |
| 29 | YOO Terry S. | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | SCHWARTZMAN Benjamin | 26% | 48% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 31 | SHYNKARUK Wil | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | CROSTHWAITE John T. | 24% | 47% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 33 | NEWELL Tim | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 34 | ALLAN Peter L. | 28% | 62% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | POWERS Douglas A. | 2% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 36 | GILLESPIE Jeremy W. | 10% | 41% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | PREUD'HOMME Xavier A. | 64% | 34% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | GOODRICH Gary | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | WEMPLE Charles | 75% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | CONNELL 3rd James | 44% | 51% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.