Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DAVIS Don | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% |
| 2 | OLIVARES Frets G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 3 | FOELLMER Oliver K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 13% |
| 3 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 5 | GRANDBOIS Peter R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% |
| 6 | FELDMAN Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 38% | |
| 7 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 10% |
| 8 | KISSINGFORD John F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 9 | WILLEY David S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 9 | KOEHN Ted | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
| 11 | AMRINE JR Terry L. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 4% | - | |
| 12 | HENSLEY Todd | 100% | 98% | 67% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 13 | SZEGO Levente (Levi) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 29% | |
| 14 | FADL Omar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 41% | 8% | |
| 15 | DIAZ Julio P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 2% |
| 16 | JONES Sam J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | ESTELL Oscar M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 30% | 4% | |
| 18 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 19 | BALESTRACCI Chris | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 5% | - |
| 20 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% | 36% | 6% | |
| 21 | GRAJALES Nestor L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 18% |
| 22 | PROCOPIO Gregory M. | 100% | 96% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | BECKER William L. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 24 | WHARTON David | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 25 | GRISWOLD Doug | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 26 | GALLUCH Peter G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 17% | 1% | - |
| 27 | WU Clarence C. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 38% | 7% | - | - |
| 29 | YOO Terry S. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | SCHWARTZMAN Benjamin | 100% | 74% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 31 | SHYNKARUK Wil | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | CROSTHWAITE John T. | 100% | 76% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 33 | NEWELL Tim | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 34 | ALLAN Peter L. | 100% | 72% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | POWERS Douglas A. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 36 | GILLESPIE Jeremy W. | 100% | 90% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | PREUD'HOMME Xavier A. | 100% | 36% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | GOODRICH Gary | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | WEMPLE Charles | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | CONNELL 3rd James | 100% | 56% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.