Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | QIAN Crystal | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% |
| 2 | HUNG Juliana K. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 62% |
| 3 | JING Alexandra | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% |
| 3 | APELIAN Katherine | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 61% |
| 5 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 54% |
| 6 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 7 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 58% |
| 8 | JING Emily | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 9 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 10 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 18% |
| 11 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 11 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 13 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 44% | 17% | |
| 14 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 79% |
| 15 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% | |
| 16 | KLINE Melissa C. | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 17 | HE Elizabeth W. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 18 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 19 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 17% | |
| 20 | GUERRA Sofia E. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 11% |
| 21 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 22 | KIM Rachael | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 23 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 50% |
| 24 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 24 | CUI Melody J. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 26 | LI Phoebe J. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
| 26 | KOROL Neta | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 28 | DEBACK Greta I. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% |
| 28 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 30 | KOO Rachel A. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 31 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 32 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
| 33 | CHO Gracie L. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 39% | 10% |
| 34 | JANG Kimberley | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
| 35 | PRIETO Sofia M. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 41% | 29% | 3% |
| 36 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 37 | YU Seneca | - | - | 9% | 34% | 41% | 15% | |
| 37 | XU Christine | - | - | 5% | 27% | 46% | 22% | |
| 39 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 40 | BATRA Chaahat | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 41 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 27% |
| 42 | CHON Sydney | - | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | MASSICK Laine | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 44 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 44 | ALTEN Ayaka | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 46 | KOROL Dana | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 47 | TRAN Ava D. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 48 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 49 | KONG Olivia | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 30% | |
| 49 | CHENG Lydia A. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 51 | WU Irene M. | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 52 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 53 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
| 54 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 46% | 15% |
| 55 | HAMZA Malak | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 56 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 57 | YE Eileen | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 58 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 59 | PENG Amber L. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
| 60 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 61 | LEE Isabelle | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 62 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 62 | OH Erin H. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 64 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
| 65 | HALL Velma | - | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 32% |
| 66 | HECKMANN Emma | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 2% |
| 67 | PERLMAN Talia | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 68 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 69 | ZHANG Sylvia | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 70 | SU Alysa J. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 71 | DING Abigail | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 72 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 73 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 30% | |
| 74 | TAN Clarisse | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 75 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 76 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 50% | 16% |
| 77 | XU Madison | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 78 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 79 | DUAN Konnie | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 80 | LEE Ariana | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | - |
| 80 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 82 | BRADFORD Meeah | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% |
| 82 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 84 | SHEN Lydia | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 85 | ATLURI Srija | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
| 86 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 86 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
| 88 | WU Julianna Y. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 89 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
| 90 | YIN Helen | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 91 | SU Alena J. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 92 | SUH Kailey E. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 93 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 94 | YEH Marissa E. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 95 | LEE Bethany W. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 96 | WALBERT Charlotte B. | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 97 | XUE Alanna | - | - | 5% | 27% | 46% | 19% | 2% |
| 98 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 99 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% | |
| 100 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 5% | |
| 101 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 32% | 8% | |
| 102 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 2% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 5% | |
| 103 | FU Qihan | 1% | 10% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 104 | WANG Ellen | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
| 104 | JIANG Hannah S. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 106 | LI Meilin | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 107 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 107 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 109 | MICHAELSEN Emily | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 110 | YEN Natalie | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 111 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 111 | PENTSAKOV Margaret | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 113 | KALE Anika A. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 114 | SCHATZ Erika J. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 115 | WU Celine | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 116 | AHMED Hannah | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 117 | GU EMILY | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 117 | LAMBERT Mahala | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 119 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 120 | LI Rachel Y. | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 121 | HSIUNG Samantha | 12% | 47% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 122 | LIU Michelle J. | 6% | 33% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 123 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
| 124 | BASSON Bayley D. | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 125 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 126 | CUI Amy | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 127 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 2% | 23% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 128 | MORADI Raiyan N. | - | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 129 | PALMER Meredith K. | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 130 | LEE Bethanie | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 131 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | - | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 132 | ORVANANOS Anice | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 133 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 134 | DU Hannah | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 135 | MCCLAIN-YU Eri M. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 136 | WANG Chloe | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 137 | HO Rachel E. | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 138 | YU Nicole J. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 139 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 140 | LEE Lavender | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 141 | WELBORN Calissa | 5% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 142 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 6% |
| 143 | LONG Madeline M. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 144 | SUN Ruoxi | - | 2% | 25% | 43% | 25% | 5% | |
| 145 | UMAP Arna | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 146 | YU Jaime L. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 147 | TANG AI JIA | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 148 | LIN Emma | 4% | 28% | 44% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 148 | SENIC Adeline | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 150 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 2% | 31% | 41% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 151 | TAN Eden E. | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 152 | PANT Anisha | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 153 | MI Anning | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 154 | YU Lauren C. | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 154 | MALHOTRA Simran | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 156 | TOM Caitlyn | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 157 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 158 | SU Michelle | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 159 | RASO Olivia | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 159 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 9% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 161 | CONVERSE Madilynn E. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 161 | LIU Sophia | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 163 | KOKES Gwendolen | 8% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 164 | LIN Victoria T. | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 164 | LAM Victoria M. | 5% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 166 | PAVE Claire | 9% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 167 | SASSE Savitri A. | 38% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 168 | ZHAO Faith | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 168 | SEO IRENE Y. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 170 | RODRIGUEZ Akemi | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 171 | TURNER Reese E. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 172 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 173 | DRACK Sarah M. | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 174 | VAUGHAN Norah | 4% | 30% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 175 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 25% | 65% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 176 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | 8% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 177 | KNOPF Jenna G. | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 178 | WOODY Chloe | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 179 | WANG Catherine K. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 180 | LUO Sandra J. | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 181 | SHUM Elizabeth | 6% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 182 | PERKINS Jazmin A. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 182 | UPTON Sydney | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 184 | SHELTON Devyn | 28% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 184 | NOVIKOV Allegra | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 186 | BHARATHI Maithreyi S. | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 186 | LI Grace | 7% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 188 | COOPER Piper W. | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 189 | COX Sofia L. | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 190 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 191 | HUNT Abigail S. | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 192 | SHINKAREV Olga | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 193 | LI Angela | 10% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 194 | ZULUETA Catherine | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 195 | WEBB Ella | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 195 | LI Sophia M. | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 197 | ZHUANG Sophie | 8% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 198 | HOANG Mai | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 199 | SUN Chien-Yu | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 200 | FURST Chloe | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 201 | SUNG Yoomin | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 202 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 203 | GRAY Martha R. | 24% | 49% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 204 | KENNEDY Elizabeth | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 205 | GOLLNICK Mira | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 206 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 207 | KNOEPFFLER ANDREA V. | 4% | 43% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 208 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | 6% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 209 | ROY Layla | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 210 | WEI Vika | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 211 | SCHUEPPERT Chloe M. | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 213 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 214 | RAO Sonia D. | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 214 | BAROCHIA Saatchi | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 216 | NOVIKOV Sienna | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 216 | ZARE Yasmin | 46% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 218 | CHARALEL Jessica | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 219 | YU Riona | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 219 | MASON-DARNELL Zoe | 65% | 32% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 221 | GUAN Grace | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 221 | PAN Anna | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 223 | BEAVER Hannah | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 223 | PARK Alexandria | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 225 | LEVY Avery | 38% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 225 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 225 | WALZ Olivia | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 228 | MEYER Lily I. | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 228 | SHEIN Evita | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 228 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 231 | HAMMER anya | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 232 | GUHA Maya | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.