Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | VALADEZ Emily T. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
2 | MARSEE Samantha | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
3 | BUHAY Rachel T. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
3 | DESAI Maya D. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
5 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
6 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
7 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
8 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 8% |
9 | WANG Elsabella Y. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
10 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
11 | KUZNETSOVA Nastassja | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
12 | TUCKER Iman R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
13 | PETTIT Sara M. | - | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
14 | SCHMITT Alana P. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
15 | ROGERS Pauline E. | - | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
16 | YODER Bridget H. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
17 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
18 | TOM Kristen Noelle C. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
19 | FISHER Nicole C. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
20 | BALMASEDA Sabrina F. | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
21 | XU Ellen | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
22 | KOO Samantha | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 12% |
23 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
24 | XI Shining | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
25 | KOBERSTEIN Maggie | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
26 | MERRIAM Katherine I. | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
27 | FEIGELES Carolyn A. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
28 | CHANG Emily | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
29 | NEIBART Fiona | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
30 | LARIMER Katherine E. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
31 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | |
32 | DHAR Aamina | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
33 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
34 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
35 | CHERNOMORSKY Alexandra E. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
36 | DARINGA Arianna | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
37 | CHEN Chloe Y. | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
38 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
39 | LI Victoria J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
40 | STONE Hava S. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
41 | GULATI Ria | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 20% |
42 | MEIEROVICH Sophie | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
43 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
44 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
45 | EDWARDS Darby | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
46 | RHIE Lena | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
47 | LIM Isabel K. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
48 | NIELSEN Dianna M. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
49 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% | |
50 | ROBINSON Stella | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
51 | BAE EMMELINE | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
52 | EDGINGTON Grace | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
53 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
54 | PLONKA Kaley V. | 5% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
55 | KRYLOVA Valery | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
56 | MILLER Mattea K. | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
57 | SHIN Andrea Y. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
58 | SKAGGS Natalie M. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
59 | KALRA Siya L. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
60 | BINSTOCK Mari I. | - | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
61 | NOBREGA Carolina S. | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
62 | CARLUCCI Laura A. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
63 | IYER Mohini R. | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
64 | GEYER Carolina M. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
65 | MACE Eliza M. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
66 | PATEL Riya | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
67 | WILSON Isley N. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
68 | PETE Gillian C. | 5% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
69 | SUN Alyssa | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
70 | NORMAN Lillia M. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% |
70 | YURT Leyla | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
72 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
73 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
73 | LOCKETT Audrey | 5% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
75 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
76 | CANNON Sophia E. | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
77 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
78 | FAUCHER Erin | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
79 | TSAI Anna A. | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
80 | BAWA Sanya | - | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
81 | DODRILL Brooke | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
82 | NI Sharon | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
83 | HURST Kennedy | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
84 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
85 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
86 | KITTLE Lauren | 21% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
87 | NOVICK Mia J. | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
88 | DANIELS Erica | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
89 | CHEN Grace | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
90 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 1% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
91 | SHIH Christina | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
92 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
93 | HOVERMAN Hannah A. | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
94 | GUZMAN Claudia | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
95 | OSBORN Charlotte | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
96 | KIM Sujin | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
96 | HOLMES Emma | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
98 | HUA Catherine W. | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
99 | CLIFTON Nicole R. | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
99 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
101 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 14% | 53% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
102 | GRIFFIN Afwe | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
103 | BATRA Simran | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
104 | STOODLEY Theresa R. | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
105 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
106 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
106 | BILILIES Sophia | 6% | 38% | 39% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
108 | HAYES Grace Y. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
109 | GORDON Sarah | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
110 | JIN Olivia P. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
111 | BENTOLILA Yedida | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
112 | WU Michelle | 4% | 30% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
113 | SPORN Melanie | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
114 | GLUCK Myriam | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
115 | ZENG Xiaoyi | 37% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
116 | BHOGAL Sukhleen | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
117 | HUANG Tina | 9% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
118 | BOWDEN Ms Hope A. | 29% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
119 | KIM Nam Heui | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
119 | ADAMS Morrigan B. | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
121 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | 28% | 44% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
122 | GLUCK Ariel | 18% | 43% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
122 | LITTLE Shannon | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
125 | WHEELER Kira | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
126 | WONG Isabelle S. | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
128 | ELDER Rhiannon C. | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
129 | MORO Diana | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.