Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 2 | BENATER Lauren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 3 | UYANIK Nerine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
| 3 | JOBALIA Ria | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | |
| 5 | PROVANCE Allison N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 6 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
| 7 | LEE Michelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 10% | |
| 8 | SMIK Leonie A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
| 9 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 10 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 11 | LEANG Andrea K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 12 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
| 13 | MAYER Ingrid V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 14 | O'REILLY Aeryn E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 15 | HUH Anna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 16 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 17 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 18 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% |
| 19 | BROWN Amanda | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | BOTNER Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 21 | GRESHAM Rebekah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
| 22 | DUNSEATH Lauren M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 23 | SHAO Ariel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | YAO Jillian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 25 | MCNEILL Claire A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 26 | AHUJA Arianna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 27 | PARTE Isabella B. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 28 | JI Catherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 29 | JOHNSON Ryleigh E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 30 | SLACKMAN Valerie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | SCHMUGAR Brooke | 100% | 91% | 63% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | HAUK Zsofia F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 34 | TIMMONS Sarah J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 35 | ZHANG Rachel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | |
| 36 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 37 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
| 38 | DICKINSON Alexandra P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
| 39 | SON Katherine (Injee) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 40 | PENSULA Sophia E. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 42 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | |
| 43 | KOKES Ava | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 44 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 45 | WEISS Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 10% |
| 46 | BELSLEY Devon K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 47 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 10% |
| 48 | KETKAR Mallika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
| 48 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 50 | GIFFORD Emily R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
| 50 | LURYE Lina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 52 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 53 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 54 | PEDERSEN Kari | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 20% | 4% |
| 55 | PETITE Jenny | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 56 | BANKS Lauren M. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 57 | ADVINCULA Anabella E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 58 | COVITZ Ashley A. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 59 | RASMUSSEN Ashelee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 19% |
| 60 | SPURLIN Alicen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
| 61 | LEWIS Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 62 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 63 | DING Sandra | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 64 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 65 | HODGES Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
| 66 | FOLEY Lauren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 66 | GILBRETH Meghan G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 30% | 7% |
| 68 | LIN Julia L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 69 | WONG Jalene L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 70 | ZHANG Rachel Q. | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | MYERS Helen Sophia A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 72 | BURN Lauren M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 73 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 73 | GOLDBERG Sophie C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 73 | PRIOLEAU Isabel | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 73 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 77 | PARK Ashley Y. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 78 | WILEY Erica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
| 79 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 80 | KWON Tiara | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 81 | MAO Amy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 82 | HENDRICK Heidi M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 83 | ZHAO Yingying | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 84 | KIM Erika S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 85 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 86 | POPOVICI Astrid I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 87 | ZHU-HILL Alice A. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 88 | ZHANG Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 89 | CHOI Eunice | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 90 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 91 | BIGGS Amelia F. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 92 | BARR Abigail D. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 93 | NORCONK Claire R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
| 94 | PARDO Sarah | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 95 | CARVALHO Maia D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 96 | ALVIDREZ Francesca A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 97 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 97 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 27% | 3% |
| 99 | WAHLER Katie R. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 100 | MENDEZ Melissa J. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 101 | BECCHINA Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% |
| 102 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 103 | DOWNARD Audrianna | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 104 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 105 | OAKE Erica | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 106 | BACH Caroline | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 107 | JACOBSON Amelia | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 108 | HSU Annabel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 14% | 2% |
| 108 | SZEWC Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 110 | ZHANG Nicole | 100% | 88% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 111 | DONDISCH Sophia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 112 | KRAVITZ Sarah | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 113 | PERALTA-VIRTUE Kamilla M. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 114 | JIANG Claire | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 115 | SHAH Chloe | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 116 | DE JAGER Celine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 117 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 118 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 119 | MORIN Jenna | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 120 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 121 | CHAWLA Ishika | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 122 | WANG Grace | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 123 | LEE Calla | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 124 | SAVINI Lorenza | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 125 | EITZEN Carissa | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 126 | TO Hang Minh | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 127 | RHEA Heather | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 128 | WEBER Nora | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 129 | SIDDIQUI Ammna K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 130 | APPLEBEE Andralyn | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 131 | XU Jessica | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 132 | GROSSL Karina | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 133 | DUAN Jenny S. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 134 | FRIEDLANDER Sarah | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 135 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 136 | HUANG audrey | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 137 | ARAYE Nasro | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 138 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 139 | THORNTON Paula R. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 140 | OH Kaitlin Y. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 141 | MCGEE Sophia | 100% | 87% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 142 | BARBER Annalise | 100% | 99% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 143 | LI Tiffany | 100% | 91% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 144 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 100% | 66% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 145 | ZHANG Ivyla | 100% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 146 | LOEHDE Sophie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 147 | NATSIOS Emily F. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 147 | SAGE Kayla G. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 149 | RANDAZZO Meredith D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 150 | CAI Diane | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 150 | LI Michelle | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 150 | SHEN Danyating | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 153 | SOIN Anika A. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 153 | MILLARD Lily C. | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 155 | CHEN Jephanie Y. | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 156 | LI AnnieSiliang | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 157 | BONDAR Nika | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 157 | WILLIAMS Sophia | 100% | 95% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 159 | LYNN Heather D. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 159 | MAHAL Anya | 100% | 41% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 161 | CHEN Hanna D. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 162 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 163 | BUCKLES Alexis A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 164 | MOK Chloe R. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 165 | WOODY Sophia | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 166 | DILLARD Katlyn M. | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 167 | LUNDEBJERG Katie | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 167 | WILLIAMS Stephanie | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 169 | RIST Rebecca (Beck) J. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 170 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 171 | ENDERLE Alexis N. | 100% | 95% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 172 | LONGSTREET Olivia | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 173 | WUNDERLICH Cara J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 174 | HAND Grace | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 175 | LEE Anna | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 176 | FALEY Alexis | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 177 | DONOS Nicole | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 178 | MAHAL Riya | 100% | 69% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 179 | WILLINGHAM Jacqueline | 100% | 76% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.