USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Div II Men's Saber

Friday, July 5, 2019 at 11:00 AM

Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 WOOD Elden S. V V V V V D V V V V V V V 4.5 5 +0.5
2 KIM Benjamin H. V V V V D V V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
3 FEENEY Sean V D V V V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
3 LINSKY Matthew D V V V V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
5 D'ORAZIO Joseph V V V V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
6 ESCUETA Tony V. V V V V V D V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
7 DESAI Drewv D. D V V V D V V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
8 RAJA Arnav D V D D D V V V V D 2.9 1 -1.9
9 KOKKIN Jack S. V V V V D V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
10 WINKLER Lucas G. V V V V D V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
11 TANG Alex Y. V V V V V D V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
12 MICHELL Bailey D V V V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
13 DU Gavin J. D V V V V V V V V D 2.6 5 +2.4
14 MONTGOMERY Jadon T. V V D V D V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
15 TRAVERS Samir T. V D V D D V V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
16 MAHONEY Colin M. D D V D D V V V V D 4.5 2 -2.5
17 HANEY Vincent V V V V V V V V D 3.1 6 +2.9
18 LOBO-BERG Gabriel (G) K. V D V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
18 KANG Brandon M. V D V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
20 LIU David J. V V V V V D V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
21 ZU Kevin V V D V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
22 TANG Brendan J. V V V D V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
23 BASALYGA Jeffrey V V V V V D V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
24 TAKEMARU Leo D V V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
25 DAMMER Mark W. V V V D V V V V D 5.0 5 -
26 LO Joshua H. V V V V D V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
27 CHO Brandon V V D D V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
28 LIU kelly V V V V D D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
29 LUEBBE Macklan C D V V D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
30 LIN William V D D D V V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
31 LEFEVRE Colin B. V D V D V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
31 GINIS Nathan V D V V D D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
33 PAPA Christopher V V V V V V V D 3.2 6 +2.8
34 CHAMBERS Amir E. V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
35 TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
36 LAU Jeremy Y. D V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
37 LIU Jonathan M. D V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
38 COVINGTON Max G. V V D V V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
39 MOORE Evan M. V V V D V V V D 2.5 5 +2.5
40 YEN Preston V D V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
41 HUDDY Brandon J. V V D V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
42 HAZLE-CARY Jacob P. D V V V V D V D 3.7 4 +0.3
42 GREENE Alexander J. V D D V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
44 GREEN IV James (Bud) D V V V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
45 WU Nicholas R. D D V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
46 CORNEJO Jeffrey A. D V V V V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
46 GANTA Vijay V V D V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
48 BUKOWSKI Bronson V D V V D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
49 HAMMARBERG Stowe D V V D V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
50 GILLIGAN Wolff V D V V D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
51 NEUHEARDT Peter V V D D V D V D 3.0 3 -
52 MURTHY mukund V V V D D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
53 HARRIS Alex K. D V D D V V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
53 CHAN Daniel D D V D V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
53 QUAN Nicholas D D V V V D V D 4.2 3 -1.2
56 TSODIKOV Matthew G. V V D D D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
57 WRIGHT Athan V D D V D V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
58 ZHOU Kevin V D V D D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
59 VAULES Charles W. D D D V V V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
60 HENNICKE Michael G. D D D V V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
61 KARNES Jameson D. V V D D V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
62 MURZYN III CJ V D V D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
63 JIANG Kevin D V D D D V V D 1.3 2 +0.7
64 GREENBAUM Ian L. V D D D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
65 BARTOLO Domenic V. V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
66 NG Jonathan H. V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
67 DOARES Andrew V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
68 PEDERSEN Leif V V V D V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
69 BECKER Dylan J. D V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
70 HUANG Eric D V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
71 HUAYTA James W. V D V V V D D 3.3 4 +0.7
72 MOSKOWITZ Mason C. V V V V D D D 4.7 4 -0.7
73 BRISLAWN Reilly R. V V D D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
74 RESHEIDAT Malik V V D D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
75 PARK Collin D. V V V D V D D 4.0 4 -
76 MESHKOV Peter A. V V D D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
77 KAHN Justin M. D V V V V D D 3.1 4 +0.9
78 GREENE Cameron J. D D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
78 YOUNG Brendon V D D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
80 BRAR Sanjeet V D V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
81 LAHOTSKA Yahor V D V V D V D 4.3 4 -0.3
82 GILES Jeremy M. V V D D V V D 4.0 4 -
83 LASORSA Matthew V V D V D V D 4.0 4 -
84 OFFUTT Tyler T. V V V V D D D 3.5 4 +0.5
84 BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. D V V V V D D 4.3 4 -0.3
84 ASHBY Ethan J. D V V D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
87 WESLER Logan A. D V V V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
88 WONG Matthew V V D D V V D 1.2 4 +2.8
89 KAYDALIN Artyom V V D D V D 1.8 3 +1.2
90 TANG Albert V V V D D D D 3.4 3 -0.4
91 FALLICK Ozzie V V V D D D D 3.6 3 -0.6
91 BLINKOV Andrey D D V V V D D 4.5 3 -1.5
93 ZHOU Brian V V D D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
94 BAILEY Asher D D V V V D D 3.6 3 -0.6
95 WALKER Robert Connor V D D D V V D 3.0 3 -
95 KOTOV Leonid V D D D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
97 GAFFNEY John M. D V V D V D D 1.7 3 +1.3
97 VILLARREAL Mateo D V V D D V D 1.7 3 +1.3
99 XU Luke D D V V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
100 MORRISROE Keegan A. D V D D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
100 YOU Jaden V D V V D D D 1.8 3 +1.2
102 SATHE Tej R. D V D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
103 WYCHE Scott H. V D D V V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
104 PORTMANN Stein J. V D D V V D D 4.0 3 -1.0
105 EPSTEIN Henry N. D V V V D D D 2.5 3 +0.5
106 CHANG Colin S. D V V D V D D 3.3 3 -0.3
107 BOHRA Rohan D V D V V D D 2.1 3 +0.9
108 HOUTZ Jackson V D V D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
109 KARPINSKI Michael A. V D D D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
110 COLLINS Andrew M. D D V D V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
110 PEAGLER Cameron D D D V D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
112 CACERES Hernan V D D D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
113 PARKER Timothy S. V D D D V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
114 RAULS Jackson V. D D D V V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
114 POPE Nico V D D D D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
114 RIERDAN Michael R. D D V D V D D 2.1 2 -0.1
114 HURST Alexander D V V D D D D 1.3 2 +0.7
118 LUKIBANOV Nicholas O. D V D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
118 LUO ZIRUI D D D V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
120 MCELLIGOTT Caden R. V D D V D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
121 RONGET Gaspard V D D D V D D 2.7 2 -0.7
122 ZHOU Miles V D D V D D D 2.0 2 -
123 SCHARDINE Ryan D V V D D D D 3.5 2 -1.5
124 AYAN Bron V D D D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
125 ATEFI Daniel D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
126 SEIDEL Jonathan J. D D D V D D 2.4 1 -1.4
127 REBELLO Derek D D D V D D 0.7 1 +0.3
128 LEMPERT Levy A. D D V D D D D 3.1 1 -2.1
129 BULL Anderson D D D D D V 2.3 1 -1.3
130 BOYLE Dylan D D D D V D 3.9 1 -2.9
130 BARBEE Jackson V D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
132 BAILEY Nate D D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
133 XU Michael D D D V D D 1.8 1 -0.8
134 BOURGHOL Matthew D V D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
134 STEPHEN Dennis L. D D D D D V 0.0 1 +1.0
136 RANSOME Jahi D D D V D D 2.5 1 -1.5
136 TONG ZACHARY D D V D D D 3.7 1 -2.7
138 FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. D D D V D D 2.8 1 -1.8
139 HOEY-WASOW Henry V D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
140 LOPEZ Lucas M. D D D D D V 0.9 1 +0.1
141 PALMA Benedict-Gillian D V D D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
142 ELDER John D D D V D D 0.8 1 +0.2
143 COLLINS William D V D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
144 PETRAMALE Samuel J. D D D D D D 3.3 0 -3.3
145 RASMUSSEN Alexzander C. D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
146 NEVILLE Eli D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
147 CORNICHUCK Cale L. D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
148 RYAN Joshua P. D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
148 HWANG Ryan C. D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
148 TUPPER Edward A. D D D D D D 2.3 0 -2.3
148 MYLEK Peter D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
148 NEWTON Payden D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
148 MOULTON Ian D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
154 TIERNO Thomas J. D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
154 DUNN John (Jack) F. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
154 NIELANDER Elliot S. D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
158 FORBES Wyatt D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
158 DEFORD Kevin W. D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.