Torrance, CA - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LOUIE Bryce | - | - | - | - | - | 8% | 91% |
2 | PARK Luke J. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
3 | YU Eric W. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 80% |
3 | DIVITO Dylan | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 51% | 19% |
5 | TULYAG Fyze A. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
5 | CHUNG Andrew N. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 20% | 78% |
7 | NAGIMOV Marsel | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
8 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
9 | KELLY William J. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
10 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 49% | 23% | |
11 | KIM Brandon J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% |
12 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
13 | LEVY Jacob M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
14 | CHENG Matthew S. | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% | - | |
15 | WU Conrad J. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
16 | HONG Daniel | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
17 | FUNK Theo S. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 2% |
18 | JEON Caleb A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
19 | OH Samuel H. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 3% |
20 | XIAO EDWARD | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | - |
21 | AYUPOV Ilya | - | - | - | - | 8% | 39% | 53% |
22 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
23 | PAEK Alex J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% |
24 | KO Brian J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
25 | FORTNER Lance R. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% |
26 | HSIUNG Richie | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
27 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
28 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
29 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 44% | |
30 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 33% | 5% |
31 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 46% | 7% |
32 | HUANG Bernard | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
33 | THAI William | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
34 | KIM Aaron J. | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - |
35 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
36 | DARIANO Noah G. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 21% | 2% |
37 | AVRON Case B. | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
38 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
39 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 1% |
40 | ZHENG Alan H. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
41 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | 1% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
42 | CHAN Anthony | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | - |
43 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
44 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
45 | MAO Connor | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
46 | CHOI Samuel | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
47 | AMICO Julian F. | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
48 | WANG Andrew | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 1% |
49 | WOMACH Tristan | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
50 | MORALES Ian N. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
51 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
52 | LI Ryan Z. | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
53 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 1% | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - |
54 | WU Jerry Z. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
55 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
56 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
57 | MA Jonas(zhao long) | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
58 | PIESNER Joshua C. | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | - | |
59 | HUANG Kevin D. | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
60 | LE Jacob W. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
61 | CHEN Bryce | 1% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
62 | RYOU Aiden | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
63 | CHEN Wilson | 9% | 39% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
64 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - | |
65 | SELIVANOV Adam | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
66 | MO Jason | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
67 | STIAGUN Nikita | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
68 | NAM Michael | 17% | 45% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
69 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
70 | LUNA Emilio | 1% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
71 | WONG Luke S. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
72 | LIM Charles Q. | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
73 | LI Avery Peihong | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
74 | HARRIS Rhonen | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
75 | NERSISYAN Raphael | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
76 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
76 | KIM Banseok | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
78 | TANG Adrian | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
79 | LEE Jesse | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
80 | CHEN Brian | 12% | 32% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
80 | BERSHIN Izzy | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
82 | CHIN Yit-Meng | 42% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
83 | BARTON Trent | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.