San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEVY Jacob M. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 2 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 3 | ZHENG Alan H. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 3 | LI Raphael C. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
| 5 | OH Samuel H. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 6 | BHARATHI Bhrugu S. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 7 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 8 | LAO Scott E. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 9 | URODOVSKIKH Evan | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 10 | FUNK Theo S. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 11 | YU Anders | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 12 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% |
| 13 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 17% |
| 14 | LAI Christopher W. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | WESTELIUS Isak R. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
| 16 | MAO Connor | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 17 | JEON Caleb A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
| 18 | SWEENEY Quinn | 16% | 58% | 23% | 3% | < 1% | - | |
| 19 | KO Tyler B. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 20 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 17% |
| 21 | SOMERS Sean | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
| 22 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 23 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | 3% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 4% | |
| 24 | HSIUNG Richie | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 25 | LUNA Emilio | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 26 | AVRON Case B. | 10% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 42% | 15% | |
| 28 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 29 | HOU Kenneth | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | SELIVANOV Adam | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 2% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 32 | HUANG Bernard | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 33 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 35 | KIM Isaiah G. | 2% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 36 | CHEN Bryce | - | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
| 37 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | MU Jeffrey | 14% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | LIM Charles Q. | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | LUH Ethan K. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 41 | YEE Johnathan | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 42 | ELLIS Preston Y. | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | BELANGER Jackson | 64% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | MENON Alexandre | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 45 | TANG Adrian | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | WYMER Taytum | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.