San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CANDELA Nicholas | D V V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 2 | MACHULSKY Ned | V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 3 | SHIN Joshua | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | SHUR Yakov C. | D V D D D | V V V V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 5 | WISOFF Jeffrey | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 6 | SHARMA Sanil | V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 7 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | NG Alexander M. | D V D V D | V V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 9 | NGUYEN Ethan D. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 10 | KIM PAUL | D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 11 | DE JONG Thijmen J. | D V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 12 | HE Jason | V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 13 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 14 | CAI Kevin P. | V V D D V D | V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
| 15 | GHILDIYAL Manyu | V D D V D | V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 16 | KIM Benjamin I. | D D D V V | V V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 17 | DORRELL Connor I. | V V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 18 | JEON Alexander E. | V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | LIANG Aaron | V V V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 20 | SHAMIS Mark | V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 21 | LIU Bennett | V V V D V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 22 | LEVY Zachari I. | V D D V V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 23 | ROBINSON Riley | V V V D D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 24 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | D D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 26 | MA Victor | D V D V D | V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 27 | RAKHIMI Marat T. | V D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 28 | SIVAGAR Leo | D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | D D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 30 | GARRETT Samuel | D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | ARABACI Jack A. | V D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 32 | HAINES Reagan | D D V D D D | V D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 33 | ZHANG Michael | D D V D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 34 | PALLI Maximillian | V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 35 | SMITH Zane A. | D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 36 | KOH Tommy | D D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 37 | VELUVALI Vivek S. | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 38 | WONG Nathan | D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 39 | STENNIS Brendan | D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 40 | LOUIE Jason | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 41 | LIU Felix | V D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 42 | WANG Andrew | D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 43 | MILEY Nick N. | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.