Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MORAIS Paulo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 2 | MION Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
| 3 | FARQUHARSON Cole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 30% | |
| 3 | ZHAO Jason L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% | |
| 5 | BOLTON Lucas R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 6 | ROBINSON Keegan B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 23% | 3% | |
| 7 | ANDERSON David C. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
| 8 | LARGAESPADA LUIS V. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
| 9 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | |
| 10 | LEE Chris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
| 11 | FERNANDES Zain | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
| 12 | WANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 13 | RINEHART Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 15 | MANGE Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 13% | |
| 16 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | MESSINESE Brando | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | 16% | |
| 18 | KONG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 19 | MCKINNEY Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 20 | HAN Andersen Y. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 5% | - | - |
| 21 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 99% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 22 | CHREKY Jacob D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
| 24 | ESTEVES Dionel L. | 100% | 93% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | 11% | 1% | |
| 26 | ARTIS Tre D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 27 | MANGE Andrew (Andrew Mange) E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 3% |
| 28 | JANSEN Jesse | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | WANG Duke R. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 30 | HARDMAN III Harry C. | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | LO Hung Yui | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 32 | ANGLIN Benjamin S. | 100% | 83% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | SON Eric | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 2% | |
| 34 | ZHANG Thales | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 35 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 36% | 7% | - | |
| 36 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | - | |
| 38 | LEYLAND John | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | MCINTOSH Michael | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | WILBERT Matt | 100% | 73% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 41 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | VO Jonathan | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 44 | PELAN Justin D. | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 45 | GREEN Zachary J. | 100% | 83% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | GREEN Scott D. | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | UPTON Craig | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | KIRSHNER Ronald | 100% | 47% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | AMES Tucker | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.