Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | - | - | 4% | 28% | 47% | 20% |
2 | GATZA Logan | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
3 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
3 | SIMMONS Tristan A. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
5 | KOUSTIKOV Max | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 9% |
6 | NORTH Alexander M. | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 9% |
7 | O'CONNOR Riley | - | - | 3% | 23% | 46% | 28% |
8 | MARIN Lucas | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
9 | DESTEFANO Julius | - | - | 7% | 36% | 42% | 14% |
10 | CHONG christopher | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 52% |
11 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
12 | TREBON Hayden | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
13 | BUYANOV Nikita V. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% |
14 | ROMERO KURI Carlos Alexander | 25% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
15 | CANO Marcos E. | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
16 | KIM Dylan J. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 20% | 3% |
17 | BENATER Adam | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
18 | SINFUEGO Adrian | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
19 | BERNARD Jack B. | 4% | 27% | 49% | 17% | 2% | - |
19 | NEEL Callum | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
21 | OKWUMABUA Chuka | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
22 | GUAN Nathan | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
23 | SCHARF Ryan | 9% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - |
24 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
25 | CURRERI Dominick | 43% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
26 | ZHANG Andy | 37% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
27 | JONES Aidan | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
28 | BRUSH Kyle | 25% | 52% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
29 | ALEMAN Jesse | 14% | 48% | 32% | 5% | - | - |
30 | JAAFAR Hamza | 18% | 43% | 32% | 7% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.