Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAVLOVICH Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 18% | |
| 2 | WILBERT Matt | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 3 | MCCARTHY Daniel (Dan) W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
| 3 | DOURAGHY Jamie M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | 7% | |
| 5 | KLEIN Johannes | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% | |
| 6 | STREB Joseph S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
| 7 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | |
| 8 | GROSS Stephen R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
| 9 | BENNETT Philippe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% |
| 10 | LAWRENCE John W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% | |
| 11 | DORFMAN Mitchell (Mitch) J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | MALNATI Donald H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 13 | CONYARD Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
| 14 | DELL George H. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 15 | KAROLAK Dale W. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 16 | DRAKE David L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
| 17 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 14% | |
| 18 | LIM Richard M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 19 | VOELZ Jim | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | BISCHOFF William B. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 20 | JOHANSON David B. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 22 | RESS Michael A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% | |
| 23 | CRACRAFT William J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 24 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 100% | 95% | 60% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | MILLIGAN Bruce C. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | DAUGHERTY Ron L. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | ZEISS Gary M. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 28 | GLADNICK Michael J. | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | POWERS James J. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | HAGOPIAN Mitchell | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | BLAIR III Ray H. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CAIN Russell (Russ) P. | 100% | 89% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | KIRSHNER Ronald | 100% | 62% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 34 | KEENEY Jeff | 100% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | WILLIAMS Theodore | 100% | 97% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | SZATHMARY Michael J. | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | BRAINERD Jim | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.