Freehold Fencing Academy - Freehold, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KANG Michael | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
2 | KUMAR Anitya | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | |
3 | HRAPSKY Ryan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% |
3 | NTONOS Thrasivoulos | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
5 | DIDASKALOU Ilias | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
6 | RITCHIE Patrick | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
7 | SHREM Samuel | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
8 | SHAFAIE Ali | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
9 | ROBITZSKI Daniel | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
10 | ROBITZSKI David | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% | |
11 | PETERS Nathan M. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | |
12 | FLEYSH Dennis | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% | |
13 | SIDDIQUI Humza | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
14 | KIM Ethan S. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
15 | HE Lawrence | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
16 | PAUL Max | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
17 | LEVCHOOK Thomas | 24% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
18 | PERSAUD Daivik | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
19 | GASIOROWSKI Devin | - | 11% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
20 | RITCHIE Mark | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
21 | LESSER Jeremy | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
22 | CHOUDHRY Hassaam | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
23 | VIEDERMAN Matthew | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
24 | SIDDIQUI Ammna | 4% | 17% | 30% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
25 | CHEUNG Liyan | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | TONG Chihao | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
27 | JIN Alexander | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
28 | LI Jeffrey | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
29 | ROWE Jason | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
30 | SEELEY Charlie | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
31 | CHOUDHRY Hannaan | 1% | 11% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.