Grand Rapids, MI - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | - | - | 12% | 87% |
| 2 | REEVES Liam | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
| 3 | SPINA Joseph B. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 29% | 1% |
| 3 | JI Aidan Y. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 3% |
| 5 | LIU Jacob B. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% |
| 6 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 7 | SANTOS Carlos R. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 8 | NYKAMP Caleb | 5% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 9 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 11 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 2% |
| 12 | HAN Derek | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 13 | LIU Ethan | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% | |
| 14 | RAJPAL Alastair | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 1% |
| 16 | CAZER Mosby | 18% | 48% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 17 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 11% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 18 | KELLY Tommy | 1% | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 19 | FECHTNER Ezra M. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 2% |
| 20 | BECKFORD Gavin "Bailey" | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | ANTONUCCI Suren | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 22 | SMITH Cooper | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | GRINDEM Stuart | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 25 | PERSINGER Charles B. | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | REAUME Nate | 37% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 27 | MEDENDORP Vincent | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.