Grand Rapids, MI - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
1 | DENNIS Ethan | 1% | 9% | 21% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 3% | < 1% | - |
2 | SCHULTZ Rowan | - | - | 2% | 8% | 20% | 31% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
3 | PICK Ian | - | 4% | 14% | 26% | 29% | 19% | 7% | 1% | - |
3 | KNECHT PRANGE Patrick | - | 1% | 5% | 16% | 27% | 28% | 17% | 6% | 1% |
5 | SCHLEUDER Aidan | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
6 | THOMAS HRZIC Nico D. | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
7 | MILLER Lance W. | 1% | 5% | 15% | 27% | 28% | 17% | 6% | 1% | - |
8 | NIKOLOV Peter | 1% | 9% | 22% | 30% | 24% | 11% | 3% | - | - |
9 | NGUYEN Tate | 1% | 6% | 19% | 29% | 27% | 14% | 4% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.