Grand Rapids, MI - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
1 | DENNIS Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 68% | 39% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
2 | SCHULTZ Rowan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 70% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
3 | PICK Ian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 55% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
3 | KNECHT PRANGE Patrick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 78% | 51% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
5 | SCHLEUDER Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
6 | THOMAS HRZIC Nico D. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
7 | MILLER Lance W. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 79% | 52% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
8 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 99% | 90% | 68% | 38% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
9 | NGUYEN Tate | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 45% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.