Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 2 | TAYLOR Daryl J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 3 | ALEXANDER Charles (Chuck) H. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 3 | HENZLER Thomas A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 5 | RICHARDS Dick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
| 6 | NEALE James H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
| 7 | SCHNEIDER Charles (Charlie) J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 8 | HUNKER Frederick | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 9 | BEIHOLD James (Jim) K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% | |
| 10 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 11 | WEINGARTEN Solomon (Sol) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 12 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 13 | RIDGE John (Drew) A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 3% |
| 14 | BOTHELIO Jere P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% |
| 15 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | |
| 16 | GELNAW William (Gypsy) H. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 17 | KAROLAK Dale W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 18 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | 4% |
| 19 | WILSON Victor T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 20 | SEGAL Mark N. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | |
| 21 | LARTZ John A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
| 22 | PAVLOVICH Robert | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | REDDING Russel M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | |
| 24 | WATSON Donald W. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
| 25 | CULLER Michael (Mike) D. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 26 | DAMIANI Paolo | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 27 | KING Charles M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | TIERNEY Luke | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 29 | WHEELER Mark C. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | KRICK Jon | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | MCDONNELL Michael | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 24% | 3% |
| 34 | MASE James B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 35 | HERMAN Ronald J. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | RESS Michael A. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 37 | WALKER William H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 14% |
| 38 | SCOTT George R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 39 | BRADFORD Wayne D. | 100% | 89% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | MILLIGAN Bruce C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 41 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | GOLDGAR Dirk | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 43 | KLEIN Johannes | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 10% | - |
| 44 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 45 | ANDERSON Michael L. | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | CASTELLANOS Rene E. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 48 | FLEMING J Daniel (Dan) | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 49 | LOGAN Mark P. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 50 | BARNA Randall | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 51 | MYERS Brent M. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | HVIDING Ketil | 100% | 67% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | POMPIAN Mark | 100% | 73% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | SCHROEDER William | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 56 | ROSENTHAL Paul E. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | TKACH Robert W. | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | ALPERSTEIN Donald W. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 59 | FRANK William N. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.