Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
2 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
3 | SLOWINSKI Maia A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
3 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
5 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
6 | MOLHO Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
7 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
8 | HALL Velma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
9 | WU Catherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 5% |
10 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
11 | RASO Sofia G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% |
12 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
13 | GOMES Rafaella T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
14 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
16 | VEERKAMP Molly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
17 | KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 11% | |
18 | VONA Elena M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 5% | |
19 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | |
20 | PROCOPIO Lucia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 4% |
21 | SLADE Mycah R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
22 | KELLY Katherine E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% |
23 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 3% |
24 | SHANG Andrea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 2% |
25 | DEBACK Greta I. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
26 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% |
27 | BRENNER Ellie (Pokenator) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
28 | HENDRIAN Rachel M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 2% |
29 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - |
30 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
31 | UPTON Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
32 | HIRSCH Gabriella H. | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
33 | SHORTALL Samantha | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
34 | MING YUE | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
35 | ZIMBALIST Lila | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - |
36 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
37 | OWEN Ashley | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
38 | VIANNA Gabriella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
39 | FELLMAN Sara | 100% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | |
40 | RUSCITELLI Kristen A. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
41 | SCHATZ Erika J. | 100% | 95% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
42 | LEE Alison | 100% | 93% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | |
43 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | 100% | 99% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
44 | SIMPSON Lydia Q. | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
45 | ZHEN Ellen | 100% | 79% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
46 | HAZEL Susan L. | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
47 | YANIV Liya | 100% | 64% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
48 | BISCHOFF Lydia M. | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
49 | HIRSCH Alyssa J. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% | - | |
51 | SCHWARTZMAN Salma | 100% | 49% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
52 | NGUYEN Lisa D. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
53 | SURI Nitya | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
54 | KNOPF Jenna G. | 100% | 87% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
55 | PRATT Allison Q. | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.