Pasadena, CA - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHIN Jason Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% |
| 2 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 3 | FUNK Theo S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% |
| 3 | OTAKE Jared K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% |
| 5 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
| 6 | HODESS Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% |
| 7 | GRANT Lachlan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
| 8 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 10 | CHAN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% |
| 11 | NGUYEN Jett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% | |
| 12 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% |
| 13 | PAEK Alex J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 14 | HONG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 23% |
| 15 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 11% |
| 16 | DIVITO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 17 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 20 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 21 | SHERMAN Marco J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 22 | GOBBO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | KIM Isaiah G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 24 | AMICO Julian F. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 26 | MO Jason | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 27 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 28 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 29 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% |
| 30 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 31 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 91% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ANDRIONO Raymond Rafael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 34 | NGUYEN Nish | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 35 | GUARDIA Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% |
| 37 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 38 | CHEN Wilson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 39 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 40 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 42 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | KIM Banseok | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 44 | LUNA Emilio | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | JI Evan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 46 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 47 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 48 | MA Jonas(zhao long) | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | SWEENEY Quentin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 50 | CHI Alexander | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | SCHENCK Theo | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 52 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | NAM Michael | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | REDDINGTON aidan | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 57 | NA Larry | 100% | 70% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | OH Jaden | 100% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 96% | 69% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | DORMAN Patrick | 100% | 75% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 62 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 100% | 48% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 63 | ZHENG Zhe | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | NERSISYAN Raphael | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 65 | ECKER Liam | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 66 | HARRIS Rhonen | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | BRENNAN Ty | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 68 | BERSHIN Izzy | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.