La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SUVOROV Yuly | V V D V V V | V V V V V V | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 2 | BREWER Andrew K. | D V V D D V | V V V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 3 | LEE Ryan | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 5 | CALDERON Pablo | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 6 | MILAM Hugh | D V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 7 | KIM Christopher S. | D D V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | WHITE Alexander (Alex) D. | V D D D V D | V V V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 9 | LEE Aaron Y. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 10 | FOWLER James A. | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 11 | PHILLIPS Scott Q. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 12 | CHIEN Brandon | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 14 | LEE Michael | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 15 | PHEN Justin P. | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 16 | PROCTOR Oliver L. | D D D V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 17 | MATVEEV Valentin S. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 18 | PALACIOS Justin M. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 19 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | V D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 20 | NG Alexander M. | D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 21 | MOORE Thomas J. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 22 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | D D V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 23 | MAENG Jake W. | V V V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 24 | BAILEY Nathan W. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 24 | LEVY Zachari I. | V V D D V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 26 | YUKELSON Michael | V V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 27 | ALEXANDER Charles (Chuck) H. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 28 | GARRISON Cameron | D V D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 29 | BHARATHI Bhrugu S. | D V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | KURITZ Marc M. | D V D V D D | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 31 | SHACKLEFORD Aidan J. | D D V D D | V V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 32 | CHIEN William | D D V D D D | V V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 33 | FULLER George K. | V V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 34 | CARTER Austin L. | D V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 35 | MUNOZ Charles O. | V V V V D V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 36 | MELCHER Jack H. | V D V V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 37 | CLINGSHOFF Christopher | V D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 38 | ZHU Zimo | V V V D D V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 39 | CANDELA Nicholas | V V D V D V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 40 | NIXON Mark | V D D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 41 | LIANG Aaron | V V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 42 | WELLS Tommy R. | D V V V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 43 | MARSH Timothy G. | V D D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 43 | ZHOU Alan | D V V V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 45 | VANDERVELDE Pierce F. | V D V V D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 46 | CONTWAY Cody L. | V D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 47 | BAILEY Creston P. | V V V D D D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 48 | GETSLA Christopher W. | V V D D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 49 | HEWITT Frank F. | V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 50 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | D D V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 51 | OGILVIE Evan C. | D D D D V V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 52 | SETTE Alessandro | D D V V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 53 | DINGMAN Spencer | D V D D V D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 54 | KIM Sterling S. | V D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 55 | COMER Daniel T. | D D V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 56 | HVIDING Raphael E. | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 57 | WANG Nathan | D D D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 58 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | D V D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 59 | MOHEBI Saam | V D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 60 | SPEICHER Eric V. | D V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 61 | ROEBUCK Alfred O. | D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 62 | SEGAL Mark N. | D D D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 63 | MCLAY Robert | D D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 64 | POCSVEILER Magor | V D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 65 | GAURIAT Olivier | D V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 66 | LEE Richard U. | D V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 66 | WERCHAN Andrew R. | V D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 68 | FERNANDEZ Sergio | D D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 69 | BEIHOLD James (Jim) K. | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 70 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 71 | JENSEN David | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 72 | MONTIJO Jr Francisco J. | D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 73 | THORESON Gary C. | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 74 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 75 | UNGER Marc A. | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.