Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% | |
| 2 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 3 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 3 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 5 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 6 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
| 7 | WU Renee | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 8 | KIM Lauren Hyomin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 9 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% |
| 10 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 12 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
| 13 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 14 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 15 | XU Christine | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 16 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 19 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 20 | XUE Alanna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | HEISER Anna M. | 100% | 97% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 22 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 23 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | SHANG Andrea | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 26 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 28 | GU Emily | 100% | 87% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | RENTON Samantha | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 31 | DU Hannah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 96% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | YANIV Liya | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.