Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NIL Michael Y. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
2 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% |
3 | NG Jonathan H. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
3 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
5 | CHAN Daniel | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
6 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 13% |
7 | GHOSH Tuhin | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 44% | 12% | |
8 | LASORSA Matthew | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 21% |
9 | GILLIGAN Wolff | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
10 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% | |
11 | HAMMER Peter A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% | |
12 | LEE Jude H. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
13 | WALKER Robert Connor | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
13 | YUAN Kevin | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
13 | ZHOU Miles | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
16 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 2% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% | - | |
17 | CHERNAEV Aleksandar | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
18 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
19 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
20 | LEDERER Justin W. | 5% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
21 | LEMPERT Levy A. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
22 | GOLD Jackson | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
23 | BOURGHOL Matthew | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - |
24 | XU Michael | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
25 | HAN Daniel Y. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | ROSEN Ben | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
27 | ZELAYA Jayson | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
28 | CHENG Kyle | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
29 | DEPEW Spencer | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
30 | KREGER Evan | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
31 | PANDEY Neil | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
32 | RAUSCHER Ryan | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
33 | MARGULIES William | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
34 | BURDAN Gabriel | 4% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
35 | KAOURIS George | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
36 | TIERNO Thomas J. | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | WEBER Mattias A. | 13% | 40% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
38 | RUDNET Noah | 51% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | FISK Ethan | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
40 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
41 | WONG Ryan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
42 | ONION Marc | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
43 | ZHANG Yankun | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
44 | GEORGE Daniel | 11% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
45 | HEKMAT Sina R. | 10% | 50% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.