Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NIL Michael Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 37% |
2 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 53% |
3 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
3 | LEVIN Mark A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | |
5 | CHAN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
6 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 13% |
7 | GHOSH Tuhin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 12% | |
8 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 21% |
9 | GILLIGAN Wolff | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
10 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | |
11 | HAMMER Peter A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | |
12 | LEE Jude H. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 3% | |
13 | WALKER Robert Connor | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
13 | YUAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
13 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
16 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 8% | - | |
17 | CHERNAEV Aleksandar | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
18 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
19 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
20 | LEDERER Justin W. | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
21 | LEMPERT Levy A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
22 | GOLD Jackson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
23 | BOURGHOL Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | - |
24 | XU Michael | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
25 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | ROSEN Ben | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
27 | ZELAYA Jayson | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
28 | CHENG Kyle | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
29 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
30 | KREGER Evan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
31 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - |
32 | RAUSCHER Ryan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
33 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
34 | BURDAN Gabriel | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
35 | KAOURIS George | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 2% | |
36 | TIERNO Thomas J. | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | WEBER Mattias A. | 100% | 87% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
38 | RUDNET Noah | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
40 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
41 | WONG Ryan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
42 | ONION Marc | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
43 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
44 | GEORGE Daniel | 100% | 89% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | |
45 | HEKMAT Sina R. | 100% | 90% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.