La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YEU Irene | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% | |
| 2 | DANIEL Chloe L. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 3 | VIE Natalie J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 3 | GAO Aretha R. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 5 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 6 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 7 | BRILL Sophie | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 8 | DRAKE-THOMAS Christine E. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 9 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% | |
| 10 | WU Amelia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 11 | SMIK Leonie A. | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 12 | BROOKS Tean R. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 13 | GERARDIN Marie | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | - |
| 14 | KIMURA Kimberley H. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 15 | CAPLIN Michelle | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 17 | HARRISON Amelia H. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 18 | BEI Karen | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | LEANG Andrea K. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 11% | |
| 20 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 21 | WILEY Erica | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 22 | SEAL Julie T. | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 23 | HARKNESS Anya C. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | QURESHI Aafreen | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | CHAN Paree A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% |
| 26 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 27 | CHAN Cheri K. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 28 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% | |
| 29 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 30 | YOUNG Ashley | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 31 | PARKER Jacquie D. | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 32 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
| 34 | GRIFFEN Emily P. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 35 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | COBLE Avery L. | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | HAWKINS Laura A. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% | |
| 38 | BEIHOLD Emily M. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 40 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 41 | ZHOU Emily | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | WANG Nora | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | ERTAS Eileen | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | STOJANOVIC Mina | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 45 | THORESON Brynn E. | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | SOIN Aditi A. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | LYNN Heather D. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 48 | RICH Caroline B. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 49 | JIANG Corina | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | SOIN Anika A. | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 51 | JIANG Claire | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 52 | FERNANDEZ Lucero | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | LI Charlotte | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 3% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | ZHANG mickey | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | CHANG Amanda Yen-Shih (Amanda) | 16% | 49% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | MOHEBI Sue | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | ZHANG Ivyla | 56% | 36% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | TONG Irene | 18% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.