La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Shawn J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 42% |
| 2 | OSTER Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 3 | MCBRIDE Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 3 | EMIR PUTRA Syed Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 5 | GEORGE Evan C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% |
| 6 | DEANS Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 26% |
| 7 | REESE Aaron S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 8 | LEONELLI Alexandre | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 10 | SOHN Kevin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 11 | LIMB Matthew G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 12 | LAU Cheung Kang | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 13 | PARK Justin W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 14 | CHOU Stephen C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 24% |
| 15 | FLORES Gerardo (Gerardito) D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 16 | HU William | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 17 | MISOGAS Matthew B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 11% |
| 18 | FOSADO Alejandro P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 7% |
| 19 | IWAMOTO Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 20 | LEE Kevin H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 21 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 22 | CHU Sean L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 23 | ZHOU Matthew R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 24 | WINKLER Lucas G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 25 | LIANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 26 | BLATCHLEY Thomas R. | 100% | 98% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | SOHN Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 28 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | 100% | 89% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | FLORES Peter D. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 30 | TANG Alex Y. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 31 | KOUNALAKIS Evangelos T. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 32 | KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 33 | FALLICK Ozzie | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | COPELAND Oliver E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 35 | KANG Brandon M. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | CHEN Howard | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | YANG Kevin S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
| 38 | MARSEE James | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | TRINH Trevor Z. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | DINU Nicholas D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 12% |
| 41 | RAY Alexander K. | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | LI Joshua L. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 25% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | BALDAUF Frederick (Fritz) P. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 45 | ELBERT Oliver D. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | CHANG Nigel | 100% | 90% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | SINGER Carson | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | HICHA Paul R. | 100% | 93% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | KIM Benjamin H. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 50 | ANFORA Andrew T. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 50 | SGHERZI Vincent | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | BURR Tanner B. | 100% | 70% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | SUORSA Markus | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 54 | ORPILLA Apolo A. | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | MCLAY Robert | 100% | 65% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 100% | 80% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.