Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GHOSH Tuhin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 14% |
2 | QIU Le | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
3 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
3 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
5 | LEVIN Mark A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% | |
6 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
7 | LAU Jeremy Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
8 | LEMPERT Levy A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
9 | STRONG Jr James S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
10 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 5% |
11 | LEE Jude H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
12 | WONG Ryan | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
13 | WU Wilmund | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
14 | KREGER Evan | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
15 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
16 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
17 | HO Kaden M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
18 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
19 | BOURGHOL Matthew | 100% | 95% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
20 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
21 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
22 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
23 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 93% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
24 | BUCCINO George | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
25 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
26 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
27 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
28 | NEVILLE James | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
29 | LO Alexander | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
30 | GEORGE Daniel | 100% | 87% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
31 | CHERNAEV Aleksandar | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
32 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
33 | CHAN Alexander S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
34 | ROSEN Ben | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
34 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
36 | CHENG Kyle | 100% | 96% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
37 | HONG Justin | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
38 | ZELAYA Jayson | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
39 | CHAO Junzhi | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
40 | KING Connor | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.