Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 2 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
| 3 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 3 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 5 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 6 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 7 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 8 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 7% |
| 9 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 42% | |
| 10 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
| 11 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 12 | FELLUS Talia E. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 13 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 39% | |
| 14 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
| 16 | KOKES Gwendolen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 17 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 18 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | 1% |
| 19 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
| 20 | TOBIN Brean | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 21 | ROHRING Anna L. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 23% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 23 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 23 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 25 | HOU Wendong | 100% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 68% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 29 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 30 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | PARK Caitlyn | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 32 | LEE Kaitlyn | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | PARK Jacqueline | 100% | 84% | 37% | 6% | - | - | |
| 35 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 36 | OETZEL Taylor | 100% | 70% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | SCARLETT Skye | 100% | 50% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | PAN Anna | 100% | 75% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | WANG Ashley | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | JIN Wendy | 100% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | SHTROM Uma A. | 100% | 69% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.