San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ZENG Lucas H. | V V D V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
2 | TSANG Matthew K. | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
3 | LA ROSA Federico | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
3 | WANG Andrew | V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
5 | LIN Dashiell | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
6 | JEON Caleb A. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
7 | LAO Scott E. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
8 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | V D V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
9 | ZHANG Luke T. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
10 | BANERJEE Anup | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
11 | DANKAR Neel | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
12 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | V V V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
13 | LI Raphael C. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
14 | DARIANO Noah G. | V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
15 | SOMERS Sean | V V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
16 | NG Eben S. | V D D D V | V V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
17 | CHENG Matthew S. | V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
18 | TSAY Jeremy M. | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
19 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
20 | XIAO Edward | V V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
21 | HOU Kenneth | V D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
22 | AIBEL Hudson J. | V V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
23 | HUANG Bernard | D V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
24 | DIERKS Kian | D V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
25 | LUH Ethan K. | V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
26 | BAO Aaron | D V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
27 | CHEN Bryce | V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
28 | GODZHIK Zachary | D D V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
29 | HOBSON Aaron K. | D D V D V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
30 | CHUANG Kian J. | D V V D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
31 | UZGIRIS Kovas | D V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
32 | HE Bu Wei O. | V V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
33 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
34 | WILT Daniel E. | V V V V D | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
35 | FINNEY Lorenz | V D V V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
36 | TANG Adrian | V V V D D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
37 | STIAGUN Nikita | D V D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
38 | YEE Johnathan | D V D V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
39 | NG Kenneth | D D V V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
40 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | D V D V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
41 | LIM Charles Q. | D V V D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
42 | BAEK David | V D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
43 | SEEDS Edward T. | D D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
44 | KHER Roan | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
45 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
46 | FU Vincent | D V D V D | D | 0.4 | 2 | +1.6 |
47 | ZENG Chuyi | D D V D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
48 | ZUO Ethan | D V D D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
49 | CHOPRA Rohan A. | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
50 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V D D D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
51 | MU Jeffrey | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
52 | JUDSON Colin | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
53 | WANG Ethan | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
54 | MA Andrew | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
56 | BELANGER Jackson | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
57 | FINK August | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
58 | LLIDO Soren | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
59 | LIN Richard | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
60 | WACHTEL Oliver | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
61 | AMAYA Jared C. | D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
62 | HOSKERI Anik S. | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
63 | WOO Christian | D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
64 | HARRIS Otto | D D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
65 | MA Bryant | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
66 | GERA Kaveer | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
67 | HIGHTOWER Palmer | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
68 | DOWLING Cian | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.