Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% | |
| 2 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 3 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 3 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 10% | |
| 5 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 6 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 42% | 9% | |
| 7 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% | 36% | 7% | |
| 8 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 16% | |
| 9 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 10 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 5% |
| 11 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 26% | 3% | |
| 13 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 14 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 15 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 2% |
| 16 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 86% | 49% | 12% | |
| 17 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 1% |
| 18 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | 17% | 2% | |
| 19 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 20 | ROY Layla | 100% | 96% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 21 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 6% |
| 23 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 97% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 25 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 8% | |
| 26 | XU Madison | 100% | 100% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 27 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 97% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 29 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 100% | 97% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 30 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 50% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 32 | ZHOU Catherine | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 69% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 91% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | LEE DAYOUNG | 100% | 4% | - | - | - | - | |
| 36 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | SHTROM Uma A. | 100% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
| 38 | CHAGARES Isabella | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.