Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 17% |
| 2 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 3 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 39% | 9% | |
| 3 | ALTIRS Alexander | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 5 | MORRILL Justin | - | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
| 6 | WILSON Jude | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
| 7 | OVERDECK Andrew | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 8 | COLE Alexander | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
| 9 | MORRILL William | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 10 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% |
| 11 | NG Jeremiah | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | |
| 12 | HUANG Tyler T. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 13 | MARGULIES William | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 14 | BLEYMAN David | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 15 | SAVOY Luca | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 16 | ZENG Noah | - | 4% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 17 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 18 | DENG Andrew | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 19 | SHOMAN Noah | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 20 | HAN Daniel Y. | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | SHTEYN Mark | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 22 | BIDWELL Ryder | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | STURN Oliver | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | BERMAN Luca | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 25 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 26 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 27 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 28 | WONG Ryan | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | BREKHMAN Eric | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | DEPEW Spencer | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | MICLAUS Justin | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | CHEN Evan P. | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 35 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 36 | HONG Vincent Q. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 37 | KIM Shaun M. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 38 | POSY Daniel | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | LEONARD Charles | 13% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 41 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 42 | TANG Charles | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 44 | BROU Inkosi | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 45 | WEBER Mattias A. | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - | |
| 46 | WANG Robert | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | MOULTON Ian | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | FLITSANOV Macabee | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 41% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | WANG Oscar | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.