Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 52% | 17% |
| 2 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% |
| 3 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 9% | |
| 3 | ALTIRS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 5 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 19% |
| 6 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | |
| 7 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 8 | COLE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
| 9 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 10 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% |
| 11 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 12 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 13 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 14 | BLEYMAN David | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 15 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 16 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 17 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 18 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 19 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
| 20 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 22 | BIDWELL Ryder | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | STURN Oliver | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 24 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% | |
| 25 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 26 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
| 27 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 28 | WONG Ryan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 91% | 64% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | BREKHMAN Eric | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | CHEN Evan P. | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 35 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
| 37 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 38 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | LEONARD Charles | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 41 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 42 | TANG Charles | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 44 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 45 | WEBER Mattias A. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 46 | WANG Robert | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 47 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | FLITSANOV Macabee | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | WANG Oscar | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.