Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KARAM Tariq A. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 2 | YEN Darren | - | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% |
| 3 | LILOV Neil | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 30% |
| 3 | LIU kelly | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% | |
| 5 | LINSKY Matthew | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 6 | WIND Nicky E. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 7 | LIN John A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 8 | KIM Avery J. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% | |
| 9 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 10 | SO Hananiah | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 46% | 12% |
| 11 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
| 12 | SHOMAN Zachary | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 13 | CHAN Matthew | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 17% | 1% |
| 14 | HO Kaden M. | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 16 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 17 | BARNETT Adam | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 18 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 19 | MORRILL William | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 30% | 4% |
| 20 | MORREALE John | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 21 | SAVOY Luca | 19% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | SANFILIPPO-SCHERER Alexander G. | 6% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 23 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 24 | YAO Jonathan | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 32% | 4% |
| 25 | WANG Robert | 4% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | WILSON Jude | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 28 | ZHENG Edward L. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | DENG Andrew | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | ALTIRS Alexander | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 31 | CHEN Evan P. | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 32 | MORRILL Justin | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 33 | YEN Preston | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% | |
| 34 | HAN Daniel Y. | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | HUANG Tyler T. | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 11% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | SHOMAN Noah | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | HONG Vincent Q. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 39 | BERMAN Luca | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 40 | NG Jeremiah | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 41 | WONG Ryan | 1% | 9% | 35% | 41% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 42 | ZENG Noah | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 43 | OVERDECK Andrew | 2% | 19% | 44% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 44 | BUCCINO George | 21% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 45 | LEVIN Mark A. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 46 | COLE Alexander | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 47 | JUN Ryan | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 48 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | MOULTON Ian | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | FLITSANOV Macabee | 41% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | CHARLES samuel | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.