Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | KARAM Tariq A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
2 | YEN Darren | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
3 | LILOV Neil | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
3 | LIU kelly | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
5 | LINSKY Matthew | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
6 | WIND Nicky E. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | LIN John A. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
8 | KIM Avery J. | D V V D V | V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
9 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
10 | SO Hananiah | V V V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
11 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
12 | SHOMAN Zachary | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
13 | CHAN Matthew | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
14 | HO Kaden M. | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
15 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | D V D V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
16 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | D D V D V D | V V D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
17 | BARNETT Adam | V V V V V V | D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
18 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | V V V V D V | D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
19 | MORRILL William | V V D V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
20 | MORREALE John | D V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
21 | SAVOY Luca | V V D V D | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
22 | SANFILIPPO-SCHERER Alexander G. | V D V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
23 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | D V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
24 | YAO Jonathan | D V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
25 | WANG Robert | D V V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
26 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | V D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
27 | WILSON Jude | V D V V D D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
28 | ZHENG Edward L. | V D V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
29 | DENG Andrew | D V D D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
30 | ALTIRS Alexander | V D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
31 | CHEN Evan P. | V D V D D D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
32 | MORRILL Justin | D D D D D V | V D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
33 | YEN Preston | D D V V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
34 | HAN Daniel Y. | V D D D V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
35 | HUANG Tyler T. | V D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
36 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | D V D V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
37 | SHOMAN Noah | D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
38 | HONG Vincent Q. | D V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
39 | BERMAN Luca | D V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
40 | NG Jeremiah | D V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
41 | WONG Ryan | D D V D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
42 | ZENG Noah | D V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
43 | OVERDECK Andrew | D D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
44 | BUCCINO George | D V D D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
45 | LEVIN Mark A. | V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
46 | COLE Alexander | D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
47 | JUN Ryan | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
48 | FIELDS Matthew S. | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
49 | MOULTON Ian | D D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
50 | EDELMAN Seth A. | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
51 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
52 | ALTIRS Giorgio | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
53 | FLITSANOV Macabee | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
54 | CHARLES samuel | D D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.