Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | COLLINS Andrew M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 19% |
| 2 | LISSO Ria A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
| 3 | WISEMAN Derrick T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 55% | |
| 3 | KELLNER Taylor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 25% |
| 5 | JACOB Bret | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% | |
| 5 | MORRISROE Hunter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 21% | |
| 7 | LOGGINS Austin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% |
| 8 | KRENZIN Elijah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | 12% | |
| 9 | DELPH Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 10 | SILVA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 34% | ||
| 11 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 12 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 14% | |
| 13 | DILLE Carolina G. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 14 | GRAHAM Ian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 15 | JARDIM Kyle A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 34% | ||
| 16 | DILLE Jackson K. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | POTVIN Nathan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 32% | 4% | ||
| 18 | DAWSON Todd | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 63% | 16% | 1% |
| 19 | BAYNE Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | - | |
| 20 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 21 | HSU Tammy | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 22 | PAL Anjali G. | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | GORMAN Caroline | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | AIKEN Charles | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 25 | CONREY Chris | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% | - | |
| 26 | WARD Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 3% | |
| 27 | RICHERSON James | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 3% | |
| 28 | RENGER Felipe | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 29 | CLARK VERGARA Douglas Jordan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
| 30 | COLLIER Nathanael L. | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | WEST Matthew S. | 100% | 86% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | WANG Andy | 100% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | PRICE Walter | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | PATTERSON Michael | 100% | 88% | 25% | 3% | - | ||
| 35 | ROACH Hal | 100% | 67% | 17% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | HARRIS Patrick | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | LE Brandon | 100% | 96% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | CREVELING Kathryn | 100% | 80% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 39 | BOWE Trey | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | MANN Michael | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | ||
| 41 | MCCLURE Morgan | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 42 | LIOTTA Madison | 100% | 82% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 43 | NI Yan-Jing | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.