Arnold Fencing Classic 2020

Div II Men's Épée

Friday, March 6, 2020 at 1:00 PM

400 N High Street, OH - 400 N High Street, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 MCNICHOLAS Evan M. - 4% 19% 38% 31% 9%
2 ROTONDI Gregory V. - 2% 13% 34% 37% 14%
3 MA Bochen 1% 8% 26% 37% 24% 6%
3 KENT Dwain - 2% 10% 24% 33% 24% 7%
5 WINTERSHEIMER Adam 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
6 DICKSON Tim - 5% 20% 38% 31% 7%
7 VANDERLINDEN Brian - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
8 PARKS Robert 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
9 HONG James - 2% 10% 26% 35% 22% 5%
10 MILLER Lance W. 5% 29% 38% 21% 5% -
11 MICKO Fritz K. 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7%
12 FITZGERALD Aidan 1% 12% 32% 34% 17% 4% -
13 CLARK Noah - 4% 17% 33% 30% 13% 2%
14 KEARNEY Matthew - 3% 13% 28% 33% 19% 4%
15 SCHOWALTER Tyler J. 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2%
16 MARTIN Dirk - 6% 25% 38% 25% 6%
17 AGARWAL Adheesh 16% 39% 32% 11% 2% -
18 SINGH Anil - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
19 EDWARDS Tim - 4% 18% 35% 32% 11%
19 HERMANSON David B. - - 2% 12% 39% 47%
21 TAROLLI Alexander 5% 21% 35% 28% 11% 2%
22 THACKER William O. - 5% 20% 36% 29% 9%
23 O’DEA Anthony - 3% 13% 31% 37% 16%
24 O'BRIEN Timothy S. 2% 13% 32% 35% 16% 3%
25 SHULL Marc 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 2%
26 KENT Matthew 11% 32% 35% 18% 4% -
27 WILLIAMS Richard 14% 34% 33% 15% 3% -
28 KUHN Jeffrey 1% 10% 30% 38% 18% 2%
29 STEFANOV Michael A. 1% 9% 25% 35% 24% 6%
29 LUKES Ollie 6% 27% 38% 23% 5% -
31 MOORE Gabriel 10% 30% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
32 DUNDEK Zachary L. 55% 36% 8% 1% - -
33 LANDIS Geoffrey A. 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% -
34 KIM Jeff 14% 39% 33% 12% 2% -
35 SILVANIA Michael 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% -
36 HUGHES Mason 29% 42% 23% 6% 1% -
37 AGUILAR Nicolas F. 10% 31% 35% 18% 5% 1% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.