400 N High Street, OH - 400 N High Street, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCNICHOLAS Evan M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | |
| 2 | ROTONDI Gregory V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | |
| 3 | MA Bochen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | |
| 3 | KENT Dwain | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 31% | 7% |
| 5 | WINTERSHEIMER Adam | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 6 | DICKSON Tim | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% | |
| 7 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 8 | PARKS Robert | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 9 | HONG James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 5% |
| 10 | MILLER Lance W. | 100% | 95% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 11 | MICKO Fritz K. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
| 12 | FITZGERALD Aidan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 13 | CLARK Noah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 14 | KEARNEY Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 15 | SCHOWALTER Tyler J. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 16 | MARTIN Dirk | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 17 | AGARWAL Adheesh | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 18 | SINGH Anil | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 19 | EDWARDS Tim | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | |
| 19 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% | |
| 21 | TAROLLI Alexander | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 22 | THACKER William O. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
| 23 | O’DEA Anthony | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% | |
| 24 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | |
| 25 | SHULL Marc | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | KENT Matthew | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 27 | WILLIAMS Richard | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | KUHN Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 2% | |
| 29 | STEFANOV Michael A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
| 29 | LUKES Ollie | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | MOORE Gabriel | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | DUNDEK Zachary L. | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | KIM Jeff | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | SILVANIA Michael | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | HUGHES Mason | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | AGUILAR Nicolas F. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.