Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BOBROW Logan | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 2 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 3 | LEE Chris | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 3 | BRUK Peter J. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 5 | HERGERT Benito | - | 1% | 6% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 11% |
| 6 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 7 | PETERS Nathan M. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 8 | LIAO Alex J. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 9 | WU Wesley E. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 10 | MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 11 | SELENDY Maximilian (Max) A. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 13 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 14 | MARX Oscar L. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 15 | BING Charles | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
| 16 | BATRAK Alexander | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 17 | REGE Advaith | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 18 | HORSLEY Alexander | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 19 | WANG Gerald Y. | 10% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | TRAUGOT Braden (Brady) C. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | KWON Ethan | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 22 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - |
| 24 | YULDASHEV Timur | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 25 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
| 26 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | AHN Jun | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | WERWA Griffith | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 30 | BELLUOMO David C. | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | EIG Ethan A. | 42% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 32 | MUNDAHL Morgan K. | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 2% | 16% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 34 | TORRES Treston | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | DEMARCO Matthew | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DEEB Adam | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 38 | OROSZLAN Daniel | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | MENG Zhaoyi | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 40 | BROWN Alexander R. | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | ARANA Massimo | 29% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 42 | WILHELM Drake | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.