The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
Maria Panyi (1), Andrey Geva (2), Igor Chirashnya (3), and Sue Moheb (4).

San Diego SYC

Y-14 Men's Saber

Friday, December 7, 2018 at 3:30 PM

San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIANG Connor - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
2 JEFFORDS Alexander - - - 1% 11% 42% 46%
3 SOHN Kevin J. - - - 1% 7% 33% 59%
3 CALLAHAN Jaden P. - - 1% 13% 35% 37% 13%
5 LIMB Matthew G. - - - 4% 18% 41% 37%
6 UEYAMA Ietetsu A. 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
7 JEAN Noe T. - 1% 11% 29% 36% 19% 3%
8 NOBLE Daniel 1% 5% 18% 31% 29% 13% 2%
9 LIU David J. 1% 10% 31% 37% 19% 3%
10 DHINGRA Gian K. - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
11 WANG Eric Y. - 6% 25% 43% 25%
12 RAJA Arnav - 1% 8% 24% 37% 24% 6%
13 PORTMANN Stein J. - 1% 7% 21% 34% 27% 9%
14 ZUBATIY Samuel 2% 10% 25% 32% 22% 8% 1%
15 GAO Albert 2% 13% 31% 35% 17% 3% -
16 JIANG Anthony 10% 36% 37% 14% 2%
17 YUN Jaesun - - 1% 9% 31% 41% 18%
18 LEE Conner M. 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4% -
19 LUO George F. - 1% 7% 22% 36% 27% 7%
20 TANN Justin 2% 13% 34% 38% 14%
21 LEUNG Nathan 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 8% 1%
22 BARBER William S. 2% 11% 26% 32% 21% 7% 1%
23 AVAKIAN Alec - 3% 12% 26% 33% 21% 5%
24 KIM Andrew H. - 1% 7% 25% 42% 25%
25 CHEN Lucas B. - 4% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
26 VO Minh Q. 4% 23% 37% 26% 9% 1% -
27 JEFFRY Nicholas B. - 1% 6% 24% 39% 26% 4%
28 SWORDS Evan F. 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 3% -
29 CHANG Colin S. - 9% 32% 40% 17% 2%
30 HJERPE Wade H. 6% 22% 34% 26% 11% 2% -
31 GIANETTO Ethan K. 6% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
32 ROSBERG Dashiell W. - - 2% 11% 29% 38% 20%
33 LE Hayden 1% 18% 42% 31% 8% 1%
34 REYES Xavier M. - 4% 22% 39% 28% 7%
35 BRISLAWN Reilly R. - - 4% 21% 39% 28% 7%
36 KOTOV Leonid 24% 40% 26% 9% 1% - -
37 KIM Shaun M. - - 2% 13% 34% 38% 12%
38 ALKIN Isaac 5% 32% 41% 19% 3% -
39 KAKEHI Nicholas B. 11% 35% 37% 16% 2%
40 XU Andrew 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4% -
41 SHERES Asher 2% 15% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
42 LO Konnor - 4% 19% 35% 29% 10% 1%
43 VAUGHN Dylan A. 52% 37% 10% 1% - -
44 KIBBAR Tomer L. 2% 14% 29% 31% 18% 5% 1%
45 CHAN Aidan 9% 34% 39% 15% 3% - -
46 HODGES Calvin - 4% 16% 32% 32% 14% 2%
47 JEFFRY Christian B. 3% 16% 34% 31% 13% 3% -
48 QIU Nathan 1% 10% 29% 35% 19% 5% -
49 HUANG Alexander C. - 1% 12% 37% 41% 9%
50 HAQ Omar M. 1% 6% 23% 38% 26% 6%
51 SONG Ryan 4% 21% 36% 28% 10% 1% -
52 PATIL Aaryan A. 2% 10% 25% 32% 22% 8% 1%
53 ZHANG Michael (Jiayuan) 3% 14% 30% 31% 17% 5% 1%
54 RODRÍGUEZ Jose 13% 33% 33% 16% 4% - -
55 LEE Sean 10% 29% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
56 BURNS Caleb 4% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1% -
57 LIU Christopher X. - 1% 9% 27% 38% 22% 3%
58 SHI Kyle 16% 41% 33% 10% 1% - -
59 ROBLEDO Everett M. 64% 30% 5% - - - -
60 LEWALLEN Reece 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% - -
61 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. 5% 38% 39% 15% 2% -
62 HOLZ William A. 17% 41% 32% 10% 1%
63 XU William 1% 28% 41% 23% 6% 1% -
64 WANG YiLe(Justin) 16% 39% 32% 11% 1% - -
65 GUO Ethan 70% 27% 3% - - -
66 STONE Esmond A. 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.