National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MANSKE Niul S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | |
2 | WHEELER Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% | |
3 | CHERNYSHOV Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
3 | CHENG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
5 | NEMAZIE David A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 3% | |
6 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 16% | |
7 | GUMAGAY Paul | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 6% | |
8 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
9 | PANTEL Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 14% |
10 | DILLE Brice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 58% | 16% |
11 | BUTLER R. Stockton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
12 | BOYKO Frank C. | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
13 | RICHARDSON Scott | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
14 | MARKOWITZ William M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | 3% |
15 | SMITH Herman E. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
16 | SCHROEDER William | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
17 | CHEN Chang-Rung | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
18 | WAGMAN Robert S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
19 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
20 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
21 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
22 | HENRY Mark R. | 100% | 85% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
23 | HOU Phi | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
24 | LOGAN Mark P. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
25 | REID Michael | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
26 | KIM Jeff | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
27 | CAFASSO martin | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
28 | CORINALDI Greg | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
29 | PARY Theodore | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
30 | TKACH Robert W. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
31 | GRENKE Brad | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
32 | DOUGLAS Michael A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 15% | 1% | |
33 | GILLESPIE Jeremy W. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
34 | STONE Ken | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
35 | HERNANDEZ Agustin | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
36 | TATE Leon J. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
37 | HVIDING Ketil | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
38 | HOFFMAN Shane C. | 100% | 79% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
39 | DELGADO Ricardo J. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.