National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUKASHENKO Darii | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 2 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% |
| 3 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
| 3 | JI Cody Walter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% |
| 5 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
| 6 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 7 | JOHNSON Langston C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 8 | BECKER Matheus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
| 9 | LILOV Neil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 19% |
| 10 | KEEFE Duncan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 11 | DODRILL Grant | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% |
| 12 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 6% |
| 13 | CONINE Tanner C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 14 | RESHEIDAT Malik | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 15 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 15% |
| 17 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
| 18 | XU William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 19 | CHON Taylor A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 20 | XUE ALEXANDER | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 21 | ZHOU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 22 | TONG ZACHARY | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 22 | WANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 24 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 25 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 26 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 27 | DU Gavin J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 28 | LEONARD Cole | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 29 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 30 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 31 | CHEONG Heonjae | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 32 | PAN Andrew W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 33 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 2% |
| 34 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% |
| 35 | SKINNER Graham B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 18% |
| 36 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 37 | BERRIO Carter E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 38 | SHERWOOD Hayden F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
| 38 | COLE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 40 | FIGUEREDO Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 40 | GUZZO Vito | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 42 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 43 | ETIN Ari | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 44 | ERMAKOV Lev | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 45 | LEMPERT Levy A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 46 | GILMORE Thomas W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 47 | FENG Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 7% |
| 48 | BRUSIE Christopher R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 49 | KENNEDY Liam A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 49 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
| 51 | CHEN Leo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 52 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 53 | JINICH Ilan R. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 54 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 55 | HO Kaden M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 56 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 57 | WANG Robert | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 57 | RODE Leon J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 8% |
| 57 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 60 | LEE Aydan J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 61 | DA GRACA Aidan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 62 | CRISAFULLI Francesco R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 63 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 64 | YEE Evan J. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | CHEN Oscar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 66 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 67 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 68 | HONG Steven | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 69 | GOLD Jackson | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 70 | FLOT Tai A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 2% |
| 71 | BONSELL Vance | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 72 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 73 | KASPER Aaron | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 74 | COLLINS Andrew M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
| 75 | FOWLER Luke | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 76 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% | |
| 77 | MCCLUNG Gavin | 100% | 94% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 78 | DELARUE NELSON Y. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 79 | BELEV Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 80 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 81 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 82 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
| 83 | LEE Justin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 84 | FORT David | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 85 | MOLINARO Lawrence | 100% | 99% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 86 | SULLIVAN Aidan J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 86 | GHENEA George Philipe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
| 88 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 97% | 71% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 89 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 90 | LIU Christopher X. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | 1% |
| 91 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 91 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 93 | SMINK Oliver | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 94 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 95 | HU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 96 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 97 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 98 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 99 | COSGROVE Connor R. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 100 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 101 | BLEYMAN David | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 102 | LUTHRA Arjun | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 103 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 3% |
| 103 | CHOI Silas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 2% |
| 105 | MYLEK Peter | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 106 | THORNHILL Kwasi | 100% | 93% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 107 | BRIDGES Benjamin | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 108 | WANG Andy | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 109 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 110 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 111 | COX Luis E. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 112 | COREY Michael A. | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 112 | DESHETLER Scott | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 114 | LOWHAM-RUZZO Alexander J. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 114 | MEHTA Krish | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 114 | REN Richard | 100% | 97% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 117 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 118 | MOL Spencer | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 119 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 120 | GUAN Luke | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 121 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 122 | DILLE Jackson K. | 100% | 95% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 123 | YANG Duncan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 124 | LANNAMAN Connor | 100% | 84% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 125 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 126 | BALDWIN Michael B. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 127 | CHANG Yufeng | 100% | 83% | 48% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 128 | MACKINNON Henry | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 129 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 130 | BAERMAN Michael | 100% | 86% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 131 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 132 | NAZAROV Adilzhan | 100% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 133 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 134 | LARRAZOLO Vincent | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 135 | MALONE Gregory D. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 136 | LEONARD Charles | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 137 | YU Thomas | 100% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 138 | MAHESH Vrshaank | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 138 | GOLD Carter | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 140 | SUSSMAN Jamie | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 141 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 141 | HOLDEN Joseph | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 141 | LIN Hadrian | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 141 | CLARK Keagan | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 145 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 145 | FUHRIG Max | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 145 | DAKIN Joseph | 100% | 41% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 145 | NISSEN Henry | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 149 | FERBER Oliver E. | 100% | 90% | 35% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 149 | HARRIS Nathan | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 151 | DUDLEY Leo | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.