Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
| 2 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 3 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% |
| 3 | BLEYMAN David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 5 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
| 6 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 16% | |
| 7 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 19% | 2% | |
| 8 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 9 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 10 | MCCARTHY Devan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 11 | GIZERSKY Jared | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 12 | KANAGALA Anagh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% | |
| 13 | GILSON Lucas B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 14 | LEONARD Charles | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 15 | HOPPA Luke H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 16 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
| 17 | PRIMUS Nazir | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 98% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 19 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% |
| 20 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | |
| 20 | CADAMBI Roshan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% | - | |
| 22 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 23 | KILGALLEN William | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 24 | SHUKUL Arhan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | PILAT Matthew J. | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | WANG Robert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 27 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 28 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | OKEEFE Mitchell | 100% | 99% | 71% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | HUANG Tom | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | LEMPERT Adam | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 33 | TIAGI Daniel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 34 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
| 35 | HUROWITZ Max | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 36 | SHI Erick | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 38 | HUANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 39 | CHEN Evan P. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 39 | CHUANG Tristan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 42 | UH Daniel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 43 | VOSS Jeffer | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 44 | PERRON Robert | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | GOLD Carter | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 47 | ONG Chinli | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 48 | LAU Justin Y. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 49 | STERN Tobias | 100% | 94% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | GLOZMAN Justin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 52 | SEN David | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | IDRISSI Idris | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 54 | CAMPO Alexander P. | 100% | 82% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | NEUMANN-LORECK Oliver | 100% | 96% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | SZCZESNY Mikolaj | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | YANG Kevin | 100% | 75% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | RAY Arjun | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.