Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 2 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 53% | |
| 3 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 13% | |
| 3 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | |
| 5 | XIANG Derrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% |
| 6 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 7 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | |
| 8 | ARCE Andrew W. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% | - | |
| 9 | KOVACS Wyatt | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 25% |
| 10 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 11 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 11 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 21% | |
| 13 | ARICO Trey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 6% |
| 14 | NICOLL William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | |
| 15 | WANG Auther | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
| 17 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 19 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 97% | 75% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 20 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 18% | |
| 21 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | |
| 22 | SONG Austin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 23 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | KOKES William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 25 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 26 | JIE WanYue | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | WANG Julang | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
| 28 | SIMON Luke | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | WILL Wrightington | 100% | 96% | 69% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 31 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
| 32 | FRUSZTAJER Miklosh | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | SHIM Peter S. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 35 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | WEI Qian | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | SORSAIA John | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | CHUNG Ian | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | PARK Maxwell | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 20% | 2% | |
| 43 | ZHENG LEON | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | XIA Eric | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | CHENG Austyn | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 46 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | LIM Kevin | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 48 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | YE Gavin | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 51 | WANG jason | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.