Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEE Jacob J | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 2 | GOOR Julian | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 3 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | GUO Sean | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 5 | HORSLEY Alexander | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 6 | KLYCZEK Andrew | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 7 | ACHILOV Sayid | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 8 | ZHONG Guoren | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 9 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 10 | LEWIS Akhil | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 11 | LIGOS Alex M. | V D V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 12 | SHAO Eric | V V V D V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 13 | PO Oliver | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 14 | BOYLE Aiden P. | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 15 | LI Jinghua E. | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 16 | GUO Cheng Jin Morris | D V V D V | V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 17 | XU Andy P. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 18 | WANG Jackson | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 19 | SONG Bryan | V D V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 20 | XU Chi | V V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 21 | BADLANI Dev | D V V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 21 | WANG Mason | V V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 23 | KOVACS Wyatt | D V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 24 | LIN James G. | V V D D D V | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 25 | XIANG Derrick | V D D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 26 | TALLARICO Matthew | V D D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 27 | ORLOV Dmitriy | D D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 28 | SONG Austin | D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 29 | VENKATESH Aditya | D D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 30 | GUO Jacob | V D D D D V | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 31 | MENG Xiang | D D D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 32 | BAUMANN Gunnar | V V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 33 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | D V V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 34 | ARCE Andrew W. | V D V D D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 35 | PLASTARAS Trey | V D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 36 | REZA Farazi | V D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 37 | WANG Julang | D D D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 38 | XU Ethan | D V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 39 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | V D D D D V | D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
| 40 | POIROT Max | V D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 41 | RNO Kyler | V D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 42 | GUO Justin | D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 43 | SIMON Luke | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 44 | NICOLL William | D V D D D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 45 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 46 | KLOTZ Isaiah | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 46 | JIE WanYue | D D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 48 | SONG Yanchen | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 49 | WEN Ethan | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 50 | LEE Jonah | D D D D D V | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 51 | WEI Qian | D D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 52 | XU Feng | D D V D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 53 | RYNSKI Gerik | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 54 | NICOLL James | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 55 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.