Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHIN Andy (Sung-moon) | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% | |
2 | BLAND Ian A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 20% |
3 | ANDERSON Mathew T. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 44% | 28% |
3 | TRAVAGLINO Stefano | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
5 | MARTIN Anthony | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
6 | LIU Darren | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
7 | LANGE Eric | 1% | 11% | 42% | 39% | 8% | ||
8 | BENDER Rhys T. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
9 | ARIAS Troy A. | - | 3% | 26% | 47% | 24% | ||
9 | CHO Tyler H. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
11 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
12 | LENAHAN Conor | 1% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
13 | WALKER IV Weymouth | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
14 | MOON Ryan | - | 5% | 29% | 45% | 21% | ||
15 | GILBRETH Geoffrey (Chance) | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
16 | CRISTIAN Ana | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 8% | |
17 | CAI Brian | - | - | 2% | 25% | 74% | ||
18 | JOSEPH William | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
19 | LABROZZI Aidan | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
20 | KIM Ray | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
21 | MALLOY Patrick G. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
22 | JORDAN Austin | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
23 | KIM Alexander | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% | |
24 | TILAKA Michael | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
25 | SWENSON Keane | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% | |
26 | MCGRATH Russell | - | 5% | 32% | 45% | 18% | ||
27 | DAVIS Campbell | 1% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
28 | HAN David | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
29 | MERMIGKAS John | 1% | 8% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
31 | CHRONISTER Charles | 25% | 50% | 23% | 3% | - | ||
32 | PARNAS Ely | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
33 | CHAKRABORTY Rishi N. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
34 | GUNDUBOGULA Raj | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
35 | NG Joshua | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
36 | PROCTER Jonathan | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
37 | BENATER Lauren | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
38 | PAK Matthew | - | 20% | 44% | 29% | 7% | - | |
39 | RYU Daniel | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
40 | FLOYD Sean C. | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
41 | HARRIS Calvin | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
42 | SAYLOR David | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
43 | CRANE Matthew T. | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
44 | JIANG Hannah | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
45 | SPERRY Gregory | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
46 | LEE Kennith | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
47 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
48 | PARK David | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
49 | CUNNINGHAM Jr. John P. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% | |
50 | ATON Dave | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
51 | WANG Maxwell | 8% | 63% | 26% | 4% | - | ||
52 | BOBERTZ Hogan | 9% | 45% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
54 | MISKELL William | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
55 | PARCELEWICZ John | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
55 | SONG Ervin | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
57 | PRICE Ethan | 4% | 34% | 40% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
58 | MAIER Elijah | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | |
59 | WEBB Jacob T. | - | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% |
60 | HIRSCH Jordan V. | 25% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
61 | EVANS Grant | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
63 | DULISSE ALeX | - | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
64 | WEBSTER Davis | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
65 | CHANG Shane | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
66 | ZIMINSKY Karel | - | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
67 | YI Daniel | 14% | 44% | 35% | 7% | - | ||
68 | PAVLINEC Jack | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
69 | CORLEY Avery | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
70 | EDWARDS Darby | 9% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 1% | - | |
70 | GARTNER Kara | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
72 | THOMPSON Suzanne | 13% | 47% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
73 | TO Hang Minh | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | ||
75 | FOSTER Nick | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
77 | PRICE Wade | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
78 | JAN Richard | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | |
79 | ALMUHAWAS Abdulmohsen | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
81 | MCARTHUR William | 13% | 38% | 37% | 12% | - | ||
82 | SCHOEN Michelle | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
83 | MATSUNAGA Alex | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
84 | GARTNER Kacie | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
84 | BALDWIN Marissa | 19% | 54% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
84 | WESTRAAD MacKinnon | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.