Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RAULS Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 2 | SILVA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 3 | RICH Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% | |
| 3 | LOGGINS Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 56% | 16% | |
| 5 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
| 6 | ANDRIEUX Ryan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
| 8 | BOND Christopher D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
| 9 | WALLACE Cade | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% |
| 10 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 19% | 2% | |
| 11 | LU Caleb | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 12 | PROGRESSOV Dmitrii | 100% | 91% | 47% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 13 | CROWLEY James | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 6% | |
| 14 | KIM Alex T. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 15 | GRAHAM Ian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 16 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 17 | KELLNER Taylor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 32% | ||
| 19 | ARDOIN Cameron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 13% | |
| 20 | WOOD Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 3% | - |
| 21 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 2% | |
| 22 | WEATHERLY Andrew | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 23 | CONREY Chris | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | DALTON Harrison | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 25 | NYSTROM Sofia | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 26 | HSU Tammy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 3% | |
| 27 | LIU Iris | 100% | 65% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 27 | ROBINSON Wesley | 100% | 98% | 80% | 36% | 6% | ||
| 29 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | LE Tan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 24% |
| 31 | SON Daniel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | ||
| 32 | DELPH Spencer | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 33 | BOWE Trey | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | YU Johnathan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | KALE Omkar | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | SANDERS Brittany | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 37 | VIDRINE Odile | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 38 | CREVELING Kathryn | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | ROBINSON Tristen | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | NEWCOMER Rose | 100% | 42% | 7% | - | - | ||
| 41 | WEST Matthew | 100% | 84% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | YANG Jenny | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | PRICE Walter | 100% | 87% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | GUAN Yuejun | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.