UNG Gainesville PE Complex - Gainesville, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 2 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 3 | DICKINSON Leonard H. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% | |
| 3 | SILVA Daniel | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 5 | LU Caleb Q. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 6 | KELLNER Taylor T. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 7 | JACOB Bret | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 8 | LOGGINS Austin J. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
| 9 | PATEL Jeet | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | |
| 10 | CROWLEY James | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 11 | DESHETLER Scott | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 12 | WISEMAN Derrick T. | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 30% | 4% | |
| 13 | RICHERSON James | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 14 | HAMILL Daniel | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 15 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU Alexandra | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | GRAHAM Ian | 2% | 29% | 45% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | DAWSON Todd | 1% | 14% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | KALE Omkar | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
| 19 | ROBINSON Wesley | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 20 | ORLOFSKY Sydney | 2% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 21 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | |
| 22 | BOONE Jason | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
| 23 | BAKER Matthew | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 8% |
| 24 | HOLDER Thomas | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
| 25 | WOOD Mitchell | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | HE Nikaia | 1% | 13% | 38% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | BOND Christopher D. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 28 | KIEU Jimmy | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
| 29 | BELNAP Sophie | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | CHEN Ethan | 6% | 33% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | MARAGULOVA Veronika | 23% | 56% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | OZMER Joseph | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | TAYLOR Kathleen | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | SANDERS Brittany | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 36 | KAMATH Meghna | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | - | |
| 37 | HOLEVINSKI Anthony | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 14% | 1% | |
| 38 | CHO Kyung Jin | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 39 | VIDRINE Odile | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | CONREY Chris | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 41 | GIRARD Parker | 4% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | LIU Iris | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | CREVELING Kathryn | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.