UNG Gainesville PE Complex - Gainesville, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
2 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
3 | DICKINSON Leonard H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | |
3 | SILVA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
5 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
6 | KELLNER Taylor T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
7 | JACOB Bret | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
8 | LOGGINS Austin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 32% | |
9 | PATEL Jeet | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
10 | CROWLEY James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
11 | DESHETLER Scott | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
12 | WISEMAN Derrick T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | 4% | |
13 | RICHERSON James | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
14 | HAMILL Daniel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
15 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU Alexandra | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
16 | GRAHAM Ian | 100% | 98% | 69% | 24% | 3% | - | |
17 | DAWSON Todd | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
18 | KALE Omkar | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
19 | ROBINSON Wesley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
20 | ORLOFSKY Sydney | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
21 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | |
22 | BOONE Jason | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
23 | BAKER Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 8% |
24 | HOLDER Thomas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
25 | WOOD Mitchell | 100% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
26 | HE Nikaia | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 11% | 1% | |
27 | BOND Christopher D. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
28 | KIEU Jimmy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
29 | BELNAP Sophie | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
30 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
31 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 94% | 61% | 19% | 2% | - | |
32 | MARAGULOVA Veronika | 100% | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
33 | OZMER Joseph | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
34 | TAYLOR Kathleen | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
35 | SANDERS Brittany | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
36 | KAMATH Meghna | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | - | |
37 | HOLEVINSKI Anthony | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | 1% | |
38 | CHO Kyung Jin | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
39 | VIDRINE Odile | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
40 | CONREY Chris | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
41 | GIRARD Parker | 100% | 96% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
42 | LIU Iris | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
43 | CREVELING Kathryn | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.