UNG Gainesville PE Complex - Gainesville, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | D V V V V | V V V V V | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 2 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 3 | DICKINSON Leonard H. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | SILVA Daniel | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 5 | LU Caleb Q. | V V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 6 | KELLNER Taylor T. | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 7 | JACOB Bret | V D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 8 | LOGGINS Austin J. | D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | PATEL Jeet | V V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 10 | CROWLEY James | V V D V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 11 | DESHETLER Scott | D V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 12 | WISEMAN Derrick T. | V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | RICHERSON James | V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 14 | HAMILL Daniel | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 15 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU Alexandra | D V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 16 | GRAHAM Ian | V V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 17 | DAWSON Todd | D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 18 | KALE Omkar | D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 19 | ROBINSON Wesley | V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 20 | ORLOFSKY Sydney | V D D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 21 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | V D V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 22 | BOONE Jason | V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 23 | BAKER Matthew | V V D D D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 24 | HOLDER Thomas | D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 25 | WOOD Mitchell | V D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 26 | HE Nikaia | D V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 27 | BOND Christopher D. | D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 28 | KIEU Jimmy | V D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 29 | BELNAP Sophie | D D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 30 | JAYASANKAR Hari | D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 31 | CHEN Ethan | D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | MARAGULOVA Veronika | V D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 33 | OZMER Joseph | D V V D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 34 | TAYLOR Kathleen | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 35 | SANDERS Brittany | D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 36 | KAMATH Meghna | V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 37 | HOLEVINSKI Anthony | D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 38 | CHO Kyung Jin | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 39 | VIDRINE Odile | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 40 | CONREY Chris | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 41 | GIRARD Parker | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 42 | LIU Iris | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 43 | CREVELING Kathryn | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.